BZA 2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TOWN OF MOORESVILLE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MINUTES The Mooresville of Zoning Appeals met on Thursday, June 14, 2007 at 6:00 PM at the Mooresville Government Center. Members present: President Jon Swisher, Mike Young, Charles McGuire, Alan Kramer, and j04 Allman. Tim Currens, Town Attorney, was present. President Swisher asked for approval and denial of the minutes for the April 12, 2007 meeting. A motion was made by Alan Kramer, second by Neal Allman, to approve the minutes for the April 12, 2007 as corrected. Motion carried 5-0. First on the agenda was JoAnn Owen, 370 W. Carlisle St, requesting a variance of use for a counseling service. Judith Brown who owns the house received a variance of use to operate a counseling service at this address. Motion was made by Mike Young, second by Alan Kramer, to grant a variance of use for 370 W. Carlisle St for the purpose of operating a counseling service. Motion carried 5-0. Neat Ross Holloway, Holloway Engineering,representing Frank Jackson of Meadow Lake on Meadow Lake Dr. requesting a sign variance for location and size of sign. The • existing sign in front of the building is 128 sq. ft. and hard to see among the other signs at that location. The new sign will be made of wood, five feet from the property line, and will be 520 sq. ft. from 46o sq. ft. Mr. McGuire asked if the existing sign was the one approximately 160 feet south of the billboard on State Highway 67. Mr. Holloway said it was. Mr. Holloway said it will be 35 to 40 feet from the shoulder. After the reading of the fact-of-findings a motion was made by Mike Young, second by Charles McGuire, to approve a variance for the footage of the sign to be 520 sq. ft and will set from 35 to 40 feet from the shoulder. Motion carried 5-0. Next Ross Holloway, Holloway Engineering,representing T A requesting a variance from development standards for PUD from three acres to acres and they would like to build condos for visiting employees while they are here from Japan. The condos would consist of four units and because of the size of the lot they do not meet requirement for development standards for a PUD. Mr. McGuire stated that this has come before the Plan Commission twice and has not received a favorable vote. Mr. McGuire stated that it did not meet the requirement of the Comprehensive Plan. The developer of the Bridgemor development said this would conflict with their community and they were not in favor of the development. George Carlisle, representing the Bridgemor residences said they were not in favor for he wanted to know what would happen to the housing when TOA no longer wanted to use the property.