Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
incorrectly sent to the property owners and newspapers showing a <br />hearing date of March 22, 1990 versus March 2~, ~990. The Board's <br />Attorney advised that additional notices would have to be sent out <br />before the next meeting, and this matter was tabled. <br /> <br /> The next item to come before the Board was the planned unit <br />development of the Raymonds. The final plat was reviewed, and the <br />Board proceeded to a hearing and findings under Chapter 5 of the <br />ordinance: <br /> <br /> 1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the <br />special exception would not be detrimental to or endanger the <br />public health, safety, morals, or general welfare with the Board <br />finding that the proposed planned unit development should, in <br />fact, make the area in question safer and be an improvement to the <br />general public and welfare. <br /> <br /> 2. The special exception would not be injurious to the use <br />and enjoyment of the properties in the immediate vicinity for the <br />purpose already committed due to the layout of the planned unit <br /> <br />development and open space is <br />development. <br /> <br /> 3. The establishment of <br /> <br />provided in the planned unit <br /> <br />the special exception would not <br /> <br />impede or substantially alter the normal and orderly improvement <br />of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district and <br />that the planned unit development should be compatible with the <br />surrounding property as presented in the final plat. <br /> <br /> 4. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, and <br />other necessary facilities were shown in the plat. <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br /> <br />