MARCH 18, 1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-4- permitted due to similiar operations and businesses being in effect in the area. 3. That the establishment of the special exception would not impede or substantially alter the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district in that this was a compatible use and in fact had been used for a used car sales lot in the past. 4. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and other necessary facilities were already provided. 5. That adequate measures have been taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion on the public road and in fact that there was already a street cut present. 6. That the special exception would be located in a district where such use is permitted and all other requirements in this ordinance applicable would be met. The Board then proceeded to findings of fact from the development standards regarding the location of two buildings on the same lot. In particular the Board found that the approval would not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community and that in effect the property had been used in a similiar manner in the past. Secondly, that the use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance would not be affected in a substantially adverse manner in that they are surrounded by similar uses. Thirdly, that the strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance would result in practical difficulties in the use of this property due to its location to other businass sites and the limitation for other types of local business uses due to the creek and proximity to other business. The Board then entertained a motion which was made by Don Barry to grant the special exception based upon the findings of fact set out by the Board previously. This was seconded by Warren Franklin and unanimously carried. A motion then