Laserfiche WebLink
application of the terms of the zoning ordinance would result in <br /> practical difficulties in the use of the property since this property <br /> was not distinct or limited by the ordinance. <br /> <br /> Next the Board looked at the variance from the special exception requirement <br />for mobile homes. The Board proceeded to make a finding that : <br /> <br /> 1. The approval would not be injurious to the public health, safety, <br /> morals and general welfare of the community. <br /> <br /> 2. The Board felt that the use and value of the area adjacent to the <br /> property included in the variance would be affected in an adverse manner <br /> by placing the mobile home in this area which would affect property values <br /> and potentially the resale of some homes in the area. <br /> <br /> 3. The Board also found that strict application of the terms of the <br /> zoning ordinance would not result in practical difficulties in the use of <br /> the property in question. <br /> <br /> Chairman Oschman then stated he would entertain a motion for or against <br /> <br />the variance petition. Wendell Thaler made a motion to deny the variance based <br />upon the findings of fact from developmental standards set out regarding the <br />subdivision of the land and also the variance from the special exception procedure. <br />This was seconded by Paul Walters and unanimously carried. <br /> <br /> The next item to come before the Board was the petition for a variance <br /> filed by H. Hosten Bible to 20 N. Carter Street, Mooresville, Indiana regarding <br /> the real estate at 130 N. Indiana Street. The variance request was for setbacks <br /> specifications on the side, rear and front yard of the aforementioned property, <br /> a variance as to minimum lot' area and thirdly, for parking spaces and other <br /> specifications as may be necessary to complete building of a 10 unit apartment <br /> project. Mr. Bible was not present but his attorney, Sam Korn, proceeded to <br /> present drawings showing the area in question. The Board reviewed the parking <br /> requirements under Table 4-A of the ordinance and determined that with a 10 unit <br /> apartment complex there would be a minimum requirement of 20 spaces. In looking <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br /> <br />