Laserfiche WebLink
2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation <br /> <br /> and enjoyment of a substantial property right <br /> possessed by other property in the same vicinity <br /> and district which would be denied to the property <br /> in question if such variance was not granted. <br /> <br /> 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the <br /> property or improvements in the vicinity and district <br /> in which the subject property is located. <br /> <br /> 4. That granting of such variance will not alter the land <br /> <br /> use characteristics of the vicinity and the district <br /> in which such property is located or diminish the <br /> marketable value of adjacent land and the improvements <br /> or cause or add to additional traffic congestion to the <br /> public streets .in the area where the improvements are <br /> to be made in accordance with the granting of the variance. <br /> <br />Thereafter, Board Member Walters put the same in the form of a favorable motion <br />to grant the variance as requested and Warren Franklin seconded said motion. <br /> <br />The motion unanimously passed and said variance was granted. There being no <br />further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned upon motion <br />duly made and seconded. <br /> <br />~teve Oschman, Chairman <br /> <br /> <br />