JULY 13, 1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

approximately the same location, the only chage being minor placement off the original foundation. The Board discussed the request and requested opinions from the floor. There being no other parties present and no objections Chairman Oschman requested a motion from the Board. Paul Walters then proceeded to make the following findings: 1. That there are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property of the petitioners and to the intended use that does not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same vicinity and in the district in which it is located. 2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and district which would be denied to the property in question if such variance was not granted. 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and district in which the subject property is located. 4. That granting of such variance will not alter the land use characteristics of the vicinity and the district in which such property is located or diminish the marketable value of adjacent land and the improvements or cause or add to additional traffic congestion to the public streets in the area where the improvements are to be made in accordance with the granting of the variance.