Laserfiche WebLink
Upon motion made by Mr. Steve Edwards, seconded by Mrs. <br />Nan Kollmeyer, and unanimously passed, the petitioners were granted <br />a variance to: <br /> <br />1. Place a multi-family building (double) on said <br />lot, pursuant to the plans presented by Mr. and Mrs. <br />Henry in the zoning district, designated "A" Single <br />Family; <br /> <br />2. Petitioners were granted a variance with a set- <br />back line to 9'4"; <br /> <br />3. Petitioners were granted a variance in the <br />front set-back line from 25' to 18'; and <br /> <br />findings: <br /> <br />4. Petitioners were granted a variance for the <br />ground floor building size from 1,800' to 1,440' <br /> <br />In granting said variance, the Board made the following <br /> <br />1. There are exceptional and extraordinary circum- <br />stances or conditions applicable to the property of <br />the petitioners and to the intended use that does not <br />apply generally to the other property or class of <br />use in the same vacinity and in the district in <br />which it is located. <br /> <br />2. That the variance is necessary for the pre- <br />servation and enjoyment of a substantial property <br />right possessed by other property in the same <br />vacinity and district which would be denied to <br />the property in question if such variance was <br />not granted. <br /> <br />3. That the granting of such variance will not be <br />materially detrimental to the public welfare of <br />injurious to the property or improvements in the <br />vacinity and district in which the subject pro- <br />perty is located. <br /> <br />4. The granting of such variance will not alter <br />the land use characteristics of the vacinity and <br />the district in which such property is located <br />or diminish the marketable value of adjacent <br />land and the improvements or cause or add to <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br /> <br />