My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SEPTEMBER 13, 2001
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
SEPTEMBER 13, 2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:17 AM
Creation date
4/15/2003 9:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
2001-09-13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lighted. She stated that the two signs would be six feet by eight feet with ground lights <br />for evening lighting. The board stated that the signs would have a twep_~etback <br />for each ~:-- ...u:_,~ ..._..,, ......... ~ ._L, _~ _ _ ~ ..... -- . <br /> ~l~:gll, WltI~,II WUUIU ~tklf[ one Ioo[ ITOI~ utc l't'glllr~'~m~. I_neystated tlaat the <br />lighting from the sign could not interfere with the neighbors or spill across the property <br />line in any way. <br /> <br />There being no objections from the floor, Mr. Alan Kramer, second by Mr. Jon Swisher, <br />made a motion to approve the variance for property at Lot 1, Block 34 from R-1 to B-2 <br />with the signs to be in compliance with the above issues discussed. Motion carded 4-0. <br />Mr. Currens stated that she would need to get the verification of mailing for the missing <br />letter. <br /> <br />Next Mr. John Larsen of Holloway and Associates, representing Mr. Elman Thomas <br />Scott, requesting a variance in development standards for lot size for property located 520 <br />Bingham Road. They are asking for a lot less than one acre that is not serviced by <br />sanitary sewers. Mr. Scott lives on the smaller lot of 7830 sq. feet and the other lot is <br />0.184 acres. He has resided in the frame house for several years and due to health <br />masons would like to build another house approximately thirty by forty feet for his <br />daughter to reside in so she can care for them. There are several other buildings on the <br />property, which if he is allowed to build another house, he will remove some of the <br />buildings. Mr. Scott has an easement for septic purposes onto the Redman property that <br />adjoins to the north, he has given a copy to Mr. Currens. The smaller of the two lots, <br />which is 7830 sq. feet, will not be relied upon to support the septic system. They have <br />supplied a layout of the purposed septic system. Mr. Scott has a total of 1.28 acres for <br />both lots, so the 0.184 and the 7830 sq. feet lot size are both net acreage after 25-foot <br />right-of-way has been dedicated to the county for roadway purposes. Mr. Larsen <br />introduced Mrs. Judy Perry, the daughter of Mr. Elman Thomas Scott, who resides on the <br />Westside of Indianapolis. She said that five years ago her husband died and her mother <br />fell and broke her back. She works for the Wayne Twp. School Corporation and lives in <br />Indianapolis, it is about a twenty minute drive to their house, and her mother called her at <br />three o'clock in the morning to come down. She feels if would more beneficial for her to <br />live closer and let them stay in their home. <br /> <br />There being no objections from the floor, Mr. Mike Young, second by Mr. Jon Swisher, <br />made a motion to grant the variance for lot size for 520 Bingham Road. Motion carried <br />4-O <br /> <br />Next Mr. John Setty, for Casey's General Store, at State Road 144 and Springmill Drive, <br />requesting a variance on the setback distance for their canopy and sign. The sign setback <br />on State Road 144 should be 40 feet, they are asking for a variance to zero foot setback <br />and for the canopy from twelve feet to ten feet setback on Springmill Drive. Mr. Setty <br />stated that Casey's General Store would provide a letter stating that if the sign needed to <br />be taken down for any repairs in the easement, that they would take it down and replace it <br />at their expense. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.