My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
JANUARY 10, 2002
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
JANUARY 10, 2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:10 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 10:37:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
2002-01-10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of extra traffic created and this will only be a pm-time business, he is looking only to <br />make a little extra money. <br /> <br />Mr. Swisher said to summarize the concerns of the neighborhood was that there is plenty <br />of areas in town for a commemial business, the increase in traffic and safety issues, the <br />decrease in property values, visual looks of the property with cars and debris, efforts to <br />maintain a residential area, noise, signage, and there is already an existing business. He <br />wanted to be sure he had everybody's concerns. <br /> <br />The findings of fact fro the Shannon and Teresa 'Karr variance are as follows: <br /> <br />1. The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and <br /> general welfare of the community due to the following: <br /> <br />The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance <br />will not be affect in a substantially adverse manner due to the following: The <br />use would lower the property value in B-3 to I-1 use and the Agriculture and <br />Residential use. <br /> <br />3. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property <br /> involved, namely: No need shown. <br /> <br />The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance will constitute an <br />unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is <br />sought; namely: No hardship shown. <br /> <br />The approval does no interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan <br />adopted under the 500 series of this Chapter, namely because: This would <br />interfere, as it is a substantial change with the I-1 or B-3 use. <br /> <br />Mr. Jon Swisher, seconded by Mr. Allan Kramer, made a motion to deny the variance <br />based on the findings of facts to operate the auto repair business at 10890 N Interurban <br />Lane. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Next on the agenda was the reorganization of the board. Mr. Barry asked for <br />nominations for Chairman of the board. <br /> <br />Mr. Alan Kramer, second by Mr. Mike Young, made a motion to nominate Mr. Jeff <br />Justus as Chairman. Motion carried 4-0 <br /> <br />Mr. Alan Kramer, second by Mr. Jon Swisher made a motion to nominate Mr. Mike <br />Young as Vice Chairman. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br />Mr. Jon Swisher, second by Mr. Mike Young, made a motion to nominate Mr. Alan <br />Kramer as Secretary. Motion carded 4-0. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.