Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />amended development plan would have the same covenants and restrict- <br /> <br />ions as the original PUD approved by the board. <br /> <br />Bill Abbott inquired whether the .22 acre parcel which <br />was the 57 foot tract discussed met the requirement of minimum <br /> <br />area and lot width to depth ratio. <br /> <br />Ross Holloway responded <br /> <br />that there was and Bill Abbott felt there would be a need to <br /> <br />obtain a variance to reduce the side yard requirement to 10 feet. <br /> <br />Signe Nicholson stated that the theory of the Plan Unit Development <br /> <br />was to allow flexibility and a design of these type of developments, <br /> <br />so as not to apply the rigid applications of the development <br /> <br />standards. <br /> <br />Bill Abbott inquired as to the reason why the developer could <br /> <br />not make the 20 foot access easement larger in the amended planned <br /> <br />unit development proposal. <br /> <br />Ross indicated that with the house <br /> <br />being currently present on the location there was no way to widen <br /> <br />it until the developer obtained approval from this board to <br /> <br />actually move the house. <br /> <br />Bill Abbott responded that he felt <br /> <br />that all of this should have been part of the amended development <br /> <br />plan. <br /> <br />Ross Holloway responded that he can put covenants in the <br /> <br />amended PUD stating that when the house is moved then the easement <br /> <br />will be widened. <br /> <br />The board inquired and determined that there were no <br /> <br /> <br />remonstrators present) b..:t- ~ wtr-e. 2. ~~W ~M.hl", fT"~6e..;t-; <br /> <br /> <br />Inspector Beikman responded that putting an entrance to the <br /> <br /> <br />studio off of Indiana Street provides a better access to the <br /> <br />"-.' <br /> <br />property. <br />Bill Abbott questioned whether the developer needed permission <br /> <br />-2- <br />