MAY 9, 1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'-- '-- '-- r did not feel comfortable presenting them. The Board decided to wait and review the minutes at their next meeting since they had not had an opportunity to review the same. The Board was polled on this issue and all agreed. The next item to come before the Board was the meeting on the comprehensive plan and proposed zoning ordinance. The Board's Attorney advised that some notice requirements to residents of Hendricks County were now required under the law and for this reason he felt the meeting should be continued until June. The Board agreed and proceeded to a discussion of the presentation of the plan. The Board agreed that it would be nice to hold the meeting in the school auditorium where an overhead projector and screen would be available. After further discussion, the Board decided to finalize who would do what parts of the presentation at the next meeting. Tim Currens requested that the Board review the proposed zoning ordinance and, specifically, to review the planned unit development section which had been totally rewritten. He requested comments before or at the next meeting. Thomas Shake of 51 East High Street then addressed the Board concerning a problem he had with neighbors that were operating a business under a variance. In particular he advised that he had problems with the hours of the business which was operating on Sundays and past 9:00 p.m., in violation of the variance. Bob Tucker advised that this variance was granted with specific hours of operation being stated. Tim Currens reviewed the findings of fact from the Board of Zoning Appeals meeting of January 20, 1988 which specifically stated that the business would not operate on -3-