MARCH 23, 1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I advised that the only changes were to be in the zoning ordinance and not in the land use plan. 1. An implementation plan needed to be developed to determine the transition process from the existing ordinance to the new ordinance. 2. What specific changes were to be made in the zoning ordinance. 3. How to define what will be required as a buffer between adjacent uses of land, such as between a residential and business classification, or between different levels of the same classification. 4 . In 1984. have not The zoning maps need to be updated. There have been numerous rezonings been translated to the zoning maps. The last update was which are on file but 5. The Board needs to reconcile the new zoning classifications with the existing classifications. 6. The creation of mlnl plat requirements for small parcels of land in order to avoid the more stringent requirements of the subdivision control ordinance. 7. Development standards need to be enacted to include both the property within the town limits and also the buffer zone. '--' The committee suggested a tenative date for the next committee meeting as Thursday, April 13, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. at Randy Haymaker's. Inspector Beikman had left for the Board a handout of suggested changes for the zoning ordinance. The Board indicated they would read those considerations for the next meeting. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned by motion duly made, seconded, and unanimously carried. -, ~~ Robert Tucker, Secretary Beebe, Chairman Dated: ¥ "2'7) l'ill