My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MINUTES 1975
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
1968-1978
>
MINUTES 1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:13:06 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 11:50:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Commission
NAME
MINUTES 1975
Plan Commission - Type
Minutes
DATE
1975-01-01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />...... <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />...... <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />Several questions concerning square footage of the Apartments were <br />asked and although these questions are of Importance eventually, they <br />are not of concern to the Plan commission at the present time. Attorney <br />Lawson assured those present that the developer must meet all <br />requirements of jtown codes as well as State building codes before <br />obtaining a building pecmlt. <br />The main point of concern of remonstrators remained the excess <br />storm water. Those speaking to the problem of drainage were: <br />Marlon Adams, Richard Allen, Ruth Allen, Walter Irvin and Floyd <br />Duncan. Mr. Gagliano spoke to reassure those concerned that he <br />doesn1t Intend to saddle the town with unnecessary expense <br />regarding the cost of the storm sewer which would be required. <br />It was also pointed out that Mr. Gagliano would be a resident manager <br />of the complex. <br />After questions and answers from the floor, pro and con, the <br />Plan Commission discussed the issue and a motion was made ~~Xf.II~~ <br />by Lewis Truax as follows: <br />"I move that we recommend to the Town Board that said property <br />be re-zoned multi-family providing the Contractor can resolve the <br />problem of drainage and come up with a detailed plan to be approved <br />prior to the start of construction." 116111 <br />The motion was seconded by Eweather Stephens and the vote was: <br />Eweather Stephens - Yes William Roberson - No <br />Lewis Truax - Yes Steve Edwards - No <br />Bart Hensley - Yes <br />Thus no action was taken as a vote of at least four (4) either <br />yes or no is required. The developer has the right to re-petitlon <br />and be heard again In thirty (30) days. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.