DECEMBER 12, 2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Pygman stated he hates 0he duplex U;itr(Q.oes notface the street on an alley, but does not feel he could oppose. He said he had taM't'o the people to the west and that they did not object to this project. Mr. Long said he had talked with Mr. Carlisle also, and he does not object. Mr. Williarnson asked if the drive for his parking was coming in off of the side alley, and Mr. Long said that was correct, that people would go out and around the duplex. They would not exit on to High Street. He said he feels like Mr. McGuire about the duplex being build behind the office, but does not feel there is any other type of use for that area. He can see if falling in line with what is in the area. Mr. Young said he agreed with some of the Board members and disagreed with some of the Board members. He knows the building will be kept up as far as the office was concerned. He has an issue with every property coming in and trying to build a duplex behind it. He could see a brick duplex could possibly be appealing. He stated that since there were no neighbors here to contest the project, it was safe to assume they were for it. Mr. Erhhart asked if the parking lot would be a hard surface and Mr. Long stated it would be. Mr. McGuire said he did not agree with Mr. Young's last statement, because that what the zoning ordinance to protect them. That is what the guidelines are there for, so that they do not have to show up every time. (3f'11,fLW Motion was made by Mr. Erhhart, second by Mr. Burner, to approve the rezone of 6,000 sq. ft. Lot I from R-l to B-1 for the business. Motion carried 8-0. Motion was made by Mr. Erhhart, second by Mr. Crouch, to approve a duplex on Lot 2, which is a 10,000 sq. ft, they will enter from the alley in the back, and duplex will match the brick on the house in front. This is contingent of the approval of the minor plat. Motion denied, vote was 4 for, 3 opposed and I abstained. Mr. Young asked for a motion on the Minor Plat and Mr. Long asked if the Minor Plat was approve would the front part be zoned for business and the back lot would stay residential. Mr. Currens said what he would have was a recommendation to the Town Council to rezone front Lot from R-l to B-1 and the back Lot would have no recommendation. He could bring it back to the Plan Commission or take it to the Town Council with no recommendation. . Motion was made by Mr. McGuire, to deny the two Lot Minor Plat; there was no second to the motion. Motion was made by Mr. Corbin, second by Mr. Crouch, to approve the two Lot Minor Plat Motion carried 6-2.