My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
OCTOBER 28, 2004
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
OCTOBER 28, 2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:14:06 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 11:50:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Commission
Plan Commission - Type
Minutes
DATE
2004-10-28
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />are selling quantities of cars out of your home, basically that is operating a business out <br />of your home. The state has certain requirements before you can have a dealers permit, <br />but that is different than our zoning ordinance. Mr. Horton asked how the Town was <br />going to define a business because the state law says he could sell ten cars. Attorney <br />Currens answered that was a state requirement. Mr. Horton asked what the Town <br />Ordinance said as to how many cars he could sell. Attorney Currens answered it doesn't <br />say, it is whether or not you are operating a business out of your home. Mr. Horton <br />declared he was not operating a business. Attorney Currens said we are going to continue <br />to watch to see ifhe is still selling cars out of his yard. Weare going to see if multiple <br />cars are for sale on a daily basis. Selling for profit is a business. Investing in cars for <br />resale is a business. <br /> <br />Mark Taylor, 331 Bridge Street, appeared before the commission with a letter of <br />complaint conceming the Bolton A venue Apartments. He told the commission there was <br />a tarp on the roof and it was blowing everywhere, windows were broken out, at one end <br />semis were parking, and the other end had an abandoned car. The commission looked at <br />the pictures. This property is zoned industrial and part of it is a non-conforming use, <br />residential use. Attorney Currens had been contacted thru Holloway Engineering <br />questioning what they could or could not do to the property, whether to re-hab, rezone, or <br />how much they wanted to invest. Attorney Currens had contacted and talked with Mr. <br />Beikman and get back with them on some alternatives. Mr. Beikman said the buildings <br />were borderline unsafe buildings, which that action could be filed also. Mr. Holloway <br />told the commission the man who owns the property lives in California and has a person <br />locally that manages the properties. They looked into renovating from top to bottom that <br />would cost in excess of$160,000, but would still have a block apartment building, so <br />they talked about demolishing it and putting back nice units. The building barely fits on <br />the property so they had asked him to talk to the Town to try to work something out. If <br />we had our druthers it would be rezoning to R-3, tearing down the buildings and <br />rebuilding nice units. He did not think it would meet the requirements for Section 8 <br />housing because no play area, parking is limited, and no green space. In the meantime <br />Mr. Holloway will call the owner to see about cleaning up the debris. <br /> <br />Redevelopment Plan Approval: Attorney Currens told the commission they work to look <br />at the plan to see ifthey thought it was consistent with the master use plan and then pass <br />this on to the Town Council. What they were looking at was an amendment to the <br />original plan and the only reason they were looking at was the added 97 acres adjoining <br />TOA, which was recently annexed to the Town and because the expansion was in excess <br />of 20 percent of the original district they had to go thru this full process. Amendments <br />were also added addressing certain projects, which one of them the commission had <br />looked at recently, was a thoroughfare plan and dealing with traffic issues. A motion was <br />made by Commissioner McGuire with a second by Commissioner Bruner to find this <br />amendment consistent with the Master Land Use Plan. Motion carried 6-0. There is a <br />Public Hearing scheduled. <br /> <br />Building Inspector, Joe Beikman, reported forty-four (44) permits and eighty-five (85) <br />inspections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.