My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2019 10:59:51 AM
Creation date
6/10/2004 10:48:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Clerk Treas
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
could be submitted. Arbor Homes had appeared before the commission in July 2002 with <br />a request for a rezone from Agriculture to R1-D and then in August with a PUD. Town <br />Attorney Tim Currens said that this filing was a significant change from the fa'st two <br />requests. Commissioner Williamson said he did not feel this filing was a significant <br />change and didn't feel the commission should have to hear the petition. Motion was <br />made by Commissioner Williamson to not hear the petition. Town attorney Tim Currens <br />responded by saying the plan commission's rules say the petition must be heard. <br />Commissioner Williamson asked if Mr. Currens was the attorney for the Town. Mr. <br />Currens answered yes, and it is my job to help keep the commission on the straight and <br />narrow. If they had requested a PUD or a small change on such as a different use it <br />would be different because a PUD had been denied, but they went to an R1-C and R-1D <br />and that presents a significant change. Chairman Young stated that based on <br />recommendation from legal counsel this was a significant change and the heating of the <br />petition had to proceed. <br /> <br /> Jeff Banning introduced Richard Henderson from Arbor Homes, and Chet Squarkin from <br /> the traffic engineering group. Mr. Banning told the commission they had several <br /> meetings with Grandview Homeowner's Association. He explained this property was a <br /> 90 acre tract on the south side of Hadley Road and was owned by the Jessups. They were <br /> proposing to have R-lC on the exterior rim of the tract with R1-D homes in the middle. <br /> R-lC homes allows a minimum lot size of 12,000 feet and a minimum home size of <br /> 1,200 square feet. R1-D zoning allows a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and a <br /> minimum home size of 1,000 square feet. The lot number had been decreased by 19 <br /> which made average density 2.5 houses per acre. Jeff Banning said this density compares <br /> with Grandview. The common open area was increased by 7%, approximately 10-12 <br /> acres. Plans include a trail system, additional landscaping, and a playground. At least <br /> 17,000 or 25,000 square feet for the playground area. Mr. Banning said they also <br /> proposed to upgrade the vinyl siding to .044 mil thickness and they would commit to <br /> 50% brick on the front on the first floor. They also proposed mounding and landscaping <br /> along the west property line which backs up to Grandview and to continue to have <br /> mounding and a split rail fencing on Hadley Road. Mr. Banning said he knew the stub <br /> street in Grandview was a major concern for people, but the stub street cannot be <br /> eliminated because it was put there for a reason and from a good planning standpoint this <br /> street is to be connected up to another street. He informed the commission the traffic <br /> study had been done and Hadley Road and St. Rd. 67 were a level of service of an A to B <br /> and it stays A-B meaning the intersection was adequate and the State had plans to <br /> improve that intersection at a later date. Mr. Henderson told the commission he felt with <br /> the comparisons to the surrounding communities and with the brick, landscaping, and <br /> vinyl upgrade he was bringing in something that meets with the surrounding area. <br /> Commissioner McGuire asked if the Plan Commission had any vehicles to legally <br /> address requirements. Attomey Tim Currens answered no, but the commission could do <br /> covenants and they can be written to be enforced by this entity. Commissioner McGuire <br /> said the drainage was an issue and the 4 foot wide concrete sidewalks, the requirement is <br /> 5 foot wide concrete sidewalks, requirements of the arterial and feeder streets and would <br /> have to meet requirements for R1-C Lot size 70 x 150 for 10,000 square foot minimum <br /> and for R1-D lot size 80 x 150 for a 12,000 square foot minimum. Size of homes 1200 to <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.