Laserfiche WebLink
the modular building next to the existing building and as far back and off of Bridge Street as <br />possible. The need a variance to maintain the twenty-foot separation between the buildings as <br />required by the building codes, setback on the alley, and setback from the property line that runs <br />across the middle of their two lots. The third part of the variance has to do with parking spaces. <br />The have since the beginning used parking along the perimeter of their lots and they realize that <br />those parking spaces are more on town right-of-way than on their property. They propose to put <br />in ten parking spaces next to the new modular building. Mr. Crouch asked what the building <br />was made of and Mr. White said it was part brick and part vinyl siding. Mr. Crouch asked if the <br />new building would be on a block crawl space and Mr. White said it would be on block columns, <br />there is about twelve ten foot column with skirting that goes around them. Mr. White said they <br />would be strapping the building down according to code. Mr. Crouch asked what was across the <br />alley and Mr. White answered there was a block building, homes and garages. Mr. Crouch <br />asked if the siding would be four inch lap siding and Mr. White said it would be the same size <br />that is on houses and beige in color like the existing building. <br /> <br />Mr. Kramer asked if there were any questions from the audience and Mr. Mark Hurter, 203 <br />Taylor Street, stated that his major concern as the Church get bigger is the parking. He was <br />wondering, as the church gets bigger where the people will park. Will they be parking along the <br />roads or people's yards. Mr. White stated that when the church grew to large to need more <br />parking than they had now, their long-term plans were to relocate. Mr. Swisher asked if they <br />had any plans for additional services and he said that was something they would consider when <br />they got to that growth stage. He said they would keep within their parking limitation and he <br />would not want people parking along the street in front of the neighbors homes. <br /> <br /> After reading the Facts-of Findings for variance from developmental standards, Mr. Kramer <br /> asked for a motion to approve or deny the variance. <br /> <br /> Motion to approve the Variance of Developmental Standards for the setbacks of the rear yard <br /> from thirty feet to thirteen feet was made by Mr. Don Barry, second by Mr. Christopher Crouch. <br /> Motion carried 4-0. <br /> <br /> Next Mr. Brown returned with a power of attorney and Mr. Kramer looked at the power of <br /> attorney and stated that it was in order so they could continue with their petition for a variance of <br /> use. Mr. Brown said they had asked a small two by three sign, set back twenty-five feet and he <br /> was told that was in the limitations of the ordinance. Mr. Barry said he was correct. Mr. Brown <br /> said that after a survey was done, they would like to extend the driveway to accommodate two <br /> cars width. Mr. Crouch asked if they were going to live in the home and Mr. Brown said they <br /> were not planning on living there, but the reason for the asking for a variance and not a rezone <br /> was in the future they may want to live there as a retirement home. <br /> <br /> After reading the Fact-of-Finding for a variance of use he asked for a motion to approve or deny <br /> Mr. Brown's petition. Motion to approve the variance of use for 370 W Carlisle Street, was <br /> made by Mr. Jon Swisher, second by Christopher Crouch. Motion carried 4-0 <br /> <br /> The next meeting of the Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals is March 11, 2004 at 6:00 P.M. at <br /> the Mooresville Town Hall <br /> <br /> <br />