My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Redevelopment Commission Minutes
>
2003-2009
>
2004
>
2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2015 10:46:27 AM
Creation date
6/10/2004 2:11:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Public Documents
Meeting Minute Type
Redevelopment Commission Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C saying the company filed a 322 ERA form with the county auditor and the State of <br /> Indiana for 2004 for abatement more than the investment. There was an amended form, <br /> they had changed their investment form and forgot to change the abatement form. Jason <br /> said he informed the Auditor's office this needs to be checked when the time comes the <br /> State has applied the abatement to the taxes. Lauren Matthes said the State is behind <br /> about two years so probably TOA should be contacted. The figures on the schedule <br /> should reflect the correct amount if the form has been filed correctly. The figures on the <br /> schedule have been made on the corrected assessed valuation. <br /> <br /> Chairman Kollmeyer said so if in June or July the commission decides to pass thru some <br /> of the money, what would go thru to the Town, School, Library, etc. Jason answered the <br /> assessed value would be passed thru. <br /> <br /> Chairman Kollmeyer reported to the commission Helen, Lauren, Jason, and himself had a <br /> meeting with Kurt Freeman and Mike Turner at the school to talk thru some of their <br /> concerns on T1F and how it affects the schools. Lauren had the commission turn to page <br /> 5 for a summary of the impact on schools and they are in agreement with this. The <br /> school general fund revenues are based on targeted per pupil goals. What is not raised <br /> from assessed value they get from State aide. The school officials agreed T1F did not <br /> affect the general fund. But, if you look at the bottom square it shows other school funds <br /> and these funds show some impact by T1F, but not a lot. The debt service fund, for an <br /> example, they don't lose any revenue but if the commission passed thru 35 million <br /> dollars of assessed value their tax rate would decrease by a little over a penny. On the <br /> transportation fund the rate could go down .0032 and bus replacement could go down <br /> .0015 so altogether you are talking about a two-cent reduction in tax rate potentially. <br /> Where the school is concerned is with their capital projects fund due to late payments of <br /> money from the state and reductions in the way their rate is figured, they are having to <br /> make transfers of money from their capital projects fund to the general filnd to keep <br /> operations going. In 2003 they had to transfer $251,000 and in 2004 they have to transfer <br /> $450,000. So the school says when the commission captures assessed value it impacts <br /> their capital projects fund. Lauren said if all the assessed value for the TIF the school <br /> would gain $78,000.00, which is not a lot of money. The school also had a <br /> misunderstanding that the commission would pass thru dollars not assessed value. <br /> Lauren told them the statute explains how the commission can evaluate each year <br /> whether they have surplus assessed value. She said the school then recognized that a pass <br /> thru is not going to help them that much. The school brought up the example that in <br /> Plainfield a situation occurred where the school superintendent was on the redevelopment <br /> commission and Plainfield was setting up a new area, the school happened to have land <br /> for a bus transportation facility in that area, so they basically in a nice way blackmailed <br /> the redevelopment commission into giving them dollars to help with their transportation <br /> facility. Basically, the way this worked, there was a bond issue the commission was <br /> doing and if there were a surplus in dollars it would go to help fund the transportation <br /> facility. The TIF area Plainfield was setting up they were capturing abatement roll-offs <br /> in the industrial area where all the distribution centers are located so the school claimed <br /> <br />C the commission was counting on all that growth anyway which makes that situation <br /> different from this commission. There is a possibility there would be potential for the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.