Laserfiche WebLink
the set-backs proposed would not interfere with any of the other <br />uses in that area and would be basically consistent with the <br />area. <br /> <br /> 2. That the use and value of the area adjacent to the <br />property included in the variance would not be affected in a <br />substantially adverse manner due to the way the structure would be <br />located and due to the angle of the streets in the area. <br /> <br /> 3. That the strict application of the terms of the zoning <br />ordinance would result in practical difficulties in the use of the <br />property which would restrict the type of building that could be <br />placed on said property and due to the shape of the property all <br />of which would result in a structure which might hurt the <br />adjoining property values if strictly enforced. <br /> <br />A motion was then made by Don Barry to grant the variance request, <br />this was seconded by Bob Tucker and unanimously carried. <br /> <br /> There being no further business to come before the Board, the <br />meeting was upon motion duly made and seconded, adjourned. <br /> <br />Secretar~ ..... <br /> <br />$~ceve Oschman, President <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br /> <br />