Plan Comm 2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Review and would be paid at $2000 as each lot was sold. Tammy VanHook confirmed that there was no approval being sought on Section IIII at this time. Jeff Dieterelen also clarified that the drainage issue being resolved in the new plans would initially assist with proposed section IIII and that the lake maintenance listed in the convenience was described as sections 1-3 & 4 even though section IIII does not exist. Tim Currens stated that the wording is within line of the plans. Dave Moore question that if a motion were to be made with contingencies how would the Plan Commission know if said contingencies were met. Tim Currens answered that once an approval was made the commission would then allow the County to oversee the criteria is met. Tim Bennett, the building inspector, asked that as there are now future plans for a section II11 what the time process might be for the County agencies to give their approvals. Dennis Chambers asked the benefit of passing now with contingencies verses waiting and voting after county approvals had been give. Tim Currens stated this would allow the plans to continue once county approvals had be given without coming back before the Plan Commission. When no further questions were asked Jeff Dieterlen called for a motion David Moore made a motion to accept with the following contingencies; street cuts, hydrant locations and drainage issues are all met and approved by the Madison Township Fire Department and all necessary County agencies, Robert Alumbaugh seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. The next item on the agenda is a site plan approval for Louie Linder, lot 5 at Flagstaff presented by Holloway Engineering. Jeremy spoke of the 2.58 acre PUD I, he addressed the parking, the asphalt drive, proposed building plans drainage concerns and sewer, it was stated that if lot 5B were every developed it would need its own retention pond. Joe Beikman confirmed the zoning and that any building plans would need to follow the I1 uses. Jeff Dieterlen confirmed that there were no concerns at Tech Review, he allowed for further questions and when none were asked he called for a motion. Perry King made a motion to accept with the addition of building height be added to the plans, Dennis Chambers seconded that motion and the motion passed.