Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'--' <br /> <br />scenario 4- Assume the same Roadway Conditions as Scenario 3. <br /> <br />Rerun the Analyses with the Generated Traffic Volumes from the <br /> <br />Proposed Marsh Development Added to the Existina Traffic Volumes. <br /> <br />The results of these analyses are as follows: <br />AM Peak Hour - An average delay of l2.3 seconds per vehicle. <br />PM Peak Hour - An average delay of l4.9 seconds per vehicle. <br /> <br />Scenario 5 - Assume the same Roadway Conditions as Scenario 3. <br /> <br />Rerun the Analvses with the Additional Traffic that will be added <br /> <br /> <br />to the streets Throuah the Year 1998 Added to the Existina Traffic <br /> <br />Volumes and the Marsh Development Traffic Volumes. <br /> <br />The result of these analyses are as follows: <br />AM Peak Hour -An average delay of l3.4 seconds per vehicle. <br />PM Peak Hour - An average delay of 19.6 seconds per vehicle. <br /> <br />SUMMARY OF PEAK HOUR VEHICLE DELAYS <br />VS <br />PERCENT IMPROVEMENT <br /> <br />Average AM Peak PM Peak <br />Delay Hour (Sec) Hour (See) <br />Scenario 1 20.4 60.+ <br />Scenario 2 60.+ 60.+ <br />Scenario 3 l1.0 l2.8 <br />Scenario 4 l2.3 l4.9 <br />Scenario 5 13.4 19.6 <br />Improvement of Scenario 5 <br />Over Existing - Scenario 1 <br />'--' <br /> <br />Percent <br />Improvement <br />AM Peak Hour <br /> <br />Percent <br />Improvement <br />PM Peak Hour <br /> <br /><34> <br /> <br />No Change <br /> <br />81.7 <br /> <br />78.7 <br /> <br />79.5 <br /> <br />75.2 <br /> <br />77.7 <br /> <br />67.3 <br /> <br />/ <br />o <br /> <br />ü <br />