Laserfiche WebLink
would like to rezone the Church to B-3. They would like to do the preliminary and not OK it, so <br />· when they sell the Church then have it OK'd. They would like to sell it Commercial zoning and <br /> they had talked with Mr. Currens and he felt they could do it, if they got it all ready to be OK'd <br /> and then bring it through. Mr. Currens stated he had said that it was subject to the decision of the <br /> Plan Commission and the Town Council approving doing that, because it would be a problem is <br /> if they rezoned it, then the prior use would no longer be an acceptable use for the property. They <br /> would like to get it all ready, and then change it as they sell it. The parsonage would be a B-1 <br /> and a Professional Building. The parsonage they definitely want to rezone and they are looking <br /> into the church. Commissioner Williamson asked if the parsonage was part of the former school <br /> area and Mr. Thomas said it was not and was separate from the Church. Commissioner Bruner <br /> asked if that was the one they were remodeling and he said it was. Commissioner Bruner asked <br /> Mr. Beikman if there was anything special they needed to do, other than applying for the <br /> parsonage only. Commissioner Young asked if they had looked at what could go in to the <br /> church if it was rezoned to B-3 and Commissioner McGuire said a liquor store could go in there. <br /> Mr. Currens said it could not be a B-2 because of the size of the building; it is above 5,000 <br /> square feet. Commissioner McGuire stated a lot of businesses could go in there that they do not <br /> want. Commissioner McGuire said that B-3 was out of the question. Mr. Thomas asked, with <br /> the school being so close, wouldn't that prevent a liquor store from going in the building. Mr. <br /> Currens said that was right and that they could put restricting covenants on its use. Mr. McGuire <br /> asked how far away the houses were from the church. Mr. Thomas said they had a large parking <br /> lot between the church and the houses were about three hundred (300) feet from the church. Mr. <br /> Thomas said their main concern was the parsonage tonight and Pastor Wright had talked with <br /> Mr. Currens about the possibility of looking into the church. Mr. Young asked if there were any <br /> other comments or questions. Mr. Thomas asked if everything he had picked up at the Clerk's <br /> Office would cover everything once he brought it in and he asked where he needed to go to file. <br /> Mr. Young said he needed to send out the notices and file the rezone with the Clerk's Office. <br /> <br /> Next Commissioner McGuire was requesting permission for Weliever to have an off side tent <br /> sale at the Marsh parking lot. He said he had signed for them to get the permit three weeks ago, <br /> because the state required they have a thirty day notice, and the next Plan Commission meeting <br /> would be too late for them to have a sale on Memorial Day weekend. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Young said he was looking at the minutes of the last meeting and there was <br /> concem about the mini-warehouses,and asked if that was that being investigated. Mr. Beikman <br /> said they were not mini-warehouses, they have material stored there, but it is for the family. He <br /> asked about a pool in Woodland Hills and Mr. Beikman said the pool was legal, because it had a <br /> lockable cover on it and was not required to be fenced. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Bryant said there is a non-conforming use issue of a house at 137 W. Washington <br /> Street that over the years has been used as a duplex. The house has gone for about two years <br /> with a single family living in it, they moved out and the neighbors and mail carder confirmed <br /> that. The owner took out the front door and put in a double door and put up a new mailbox with <br /> the address of 137 ½ W. Washington St. According to our ordinance book if they had a variance <br /> it would be void, because it had not been in use for twelve months. Mr. Currens said if was not a <br /> variance, but a non-conforming use, they are in violation. Commissioner Bryant said the Mr. <br /> Beikman had looked at it and could not find anything to say that is was out of compliance, but he <br /> <br /> <br />