Laserfiche WebLink
2. That the use and value of the area adjacent to the <br />property included in the variance would not be affected in any <br />substantially adverse manner with the restrictions placed. <br />set-backs in this instance due to the general topography. <br /> <br /> 3. That the need for the variance arises from some <br />condition peculiar to the property involved. <br /> <br /> 4. That the strict application of the terms of the zoning <br />ordinance will constitute an unnecessary hardship if applied to <br /> <br />the property for which the variance <br /> <br /> 5. That the approval does not <br />the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />is sought. <br /> <br />interfere substantially with <br /> <br />That the Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals unanimously <br />grants this variance this / day of May, 1993. <br /> <br />MOORESVILLE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br /> <br />