My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BZA 2001
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
BZA 2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2012 4:34:43 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 11:05:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Clerk Treas
DATE
7/5/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOORESVILLE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br /> MINUTES <br /> THURSDAY, NOVEMBER.S, 2001 <br /> The board of Zoning Appeals met on Thursday,November S, 2001, at 7:00 P.M. at the <br /> Mooresville Town Hall. <br /> Members present were:President Don Barry, Alan Kramer and Jon Swisher. Mike <br /> Young and Jeff Justus were absent. Tim Currens,Town Attorney was absent. <br /> Motion was made to approve the minutes as amended by Jon Swisher and second by <br /> Alan Kramer. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> Next on the agenda was Coyote Creek to determine the zoning classification for an <br /> indoor shooting range at 940 State Road 67 South. Mr.Jack Perry, owner of the <br /> Mooresville Bowling Center, said the bowling alley was closed last May and they have <br /> built storage on the property. They want to use the existing building as an indoor <br /> shooting range. The property is now zoned I-2, but there is not a classification for the <br /> indoor range. Mr. Ken Fisher, owner of the Ace Hardware and Fisher Automotive, Tnc. <br /> in Mooresville, stated they wanted to turn the bowling alley into a pistol shooting range. <br /> They have contacted the National Rifle Association on the regulation required to build a <br /> shooting range, such as how to insulate the building for sound and safety regulations. <br /> They have examined several other firing ranges. They have determined the building can <br /> accommodate sixteen (16) firing lanes or firing booths, they plan to start with five(5) <br /> booths and then expand as business grows, eventually having ten(10)booths. They also <br /> plan to sell guns, ammunition and offer training in use of guns and safety. They have a <br /> Federal Firearms license to sell guns and ammunition and their son-in-law has been <br /> trained by the NRA in firearms safety. <br /> Mr. Barry stated the duty of the Zoning Board was to set the classification for an indoor <br /> shooting range, since there is not a classification in our town ordinance. Mr. Barry read a <br /> letter from the Town Attorney stating that in reviewing other Ordinances that this type of <br /> use is generally placed in a B-3 General Business or I-1 or I-II Industrial classification or <br /> all three(3). He thought this information from other communities might be helpful and it <br /> would seem logical if it fits to allow it in each of these areas. It seem that a higher <br /> industrial use would conflict with the commercial use. <br /> Mr.Barry stated that it is up to the Board to determine if the shooting range should be <br /> allowed in one or all three(3) classifications. Mr.Barry stated that the boundaries for <br /> buffers enlarge for each classification. Mr. Kramer asked if that area was all classified as <br /> Industrial? Mr.Barry stated that the area was all-industrial. He said that if the <br /> classification was higher that I-H that a Commercial business could not build next to <br /> them because of the buffer zone requirement without asking for a variance. Mr.Fisher <br /> asked if with a B-3 classification could a shooting range go into a shopping mall and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.