Laserfiche WebLink
Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals <br /> Thursday, February 10, 2005 <br /> Minutes <br /> The Board of Zoning Appeals met on Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 6:00 P.M. at <br /> the Mooresville Town Hall. <br /> Members present were: Jon Swisher, President, Mike Young, Don Barry and Alan <br /> Kramer. Tim Currens, Town Attorney, was absent. <br /> Motion was made by Mike Young, second by Don Barry, to approve the minutes <br /> of the January 13, 2005 meeting. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> Old Business: Election of officers that was carried over from the January meeting. <br /> Mr. Swisher asked for a motion for Vice President. <br /> A motion was made by Mike Young, second by Don Barry, to appoint Alan <br /> Kramer for Vice President. Motion carried 3-1. <br /> Mr. Swisher asked for a motion for Secretary. A motion was made by Mike <br /> Young, second by Alan Kramer, to appoint Don Barry for Secretary. Motion <br /> carried 3-1. <br /> Next was Ross Holloway, Holloway Engineering, representing C. Patton, 330 <br /> Bolton Ave. that was tabled at the January meeting. Mr. Holloway said they have <br /> not been able to meet the requirements for parking spaces and have reached the <br /> point where the board needs to make a decision. They have cleaned up some of the <br /> blue snow and Mr. Patton is out of the country, so they have not received any <br /> guidance from him. Mr. Holloway asked for a vote for the variance that was <br /> before the board. Mr. Swisher asked if there were any questions from the board <br /> and there were no questions. Mr. Swisher asked if there were any remarks from <br /> the floor. Mr. Mark Taylor, 331 Bridge St., said that most of the people around the <br /> area were against the apartment project and they would rather see a business there. <br /> They do appreciate them cleaning up the blue tarp. <br /> Mr. Barry said since they could not meet the parking requirements he did not see <br /> how the board could grant a variance. Mr. Holloway said if they went to six units <br /> they could meet the parking requirements, so they would like for the board to go <br /> is with a vote for six units rather than have a denial for the variance. <br />