BZA 2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

built on the lot in question.Ken Ball of 127 Sundown Manor disagreed on the statement this was the first time this property was brought to this board,there had been other projects brought to the Town Board and the Plan Commission. Kay Norris of 229 Sundown Manor came forward to express her concerns; she said that the homes there are all 1,000 square feet and a home that size and she does not feel that it should be built there she also had safety issues with Old 67. Mrs. Whaley ask Mr. Holloway if this is a part of Sundown Manor,be said that it was not given a lot number but it is on the plat.He also that he did not know if it was originally ment to build on or not.Mr. Holloway did say that there was a Quiet Title Law suit to clean up the title,he also repeated that it is zoned R1. Mr. Holloway said that the maximum 21,000 square feet could be built on this property.Mr. Holloway said that with a variance this property has no value.Mr. Holloway feels that this is a reasonable request. Mrs.Whaley asked if the property owner has maintained the property, at that time Richard Willowy of Sundown Manor stood up to say that He and several residents had mowed this property.Lori Ball of 127 Sundown Manor also talked About the lot not being maintained and ask where they would put lawn mowers,yard tools etc. If there was not a garage or shed. At this time Mr. Holloway asked the Board to look at the map And pointed out that lot 7 is only about 20 feet from the property line and lot 1 only about 10 from their property line. Charles McGuire a past Plan Commission member, said that a few years ago he had a meeting with several of the neighbors of Sunset Manor and that at that time they were convinced that told that nothing would ever be built on the property in question.Nothing in writing has been found. Alan Kramer expressed safety concerns. A motion was made by Ann Whaley to deny the variance,Mike Young seconded the motion the vote was 4-0 to deny. Ross Holloway,for H Donald Stacy came to ask for 6 variances at 36 Lincoln Lane,to be able to have a minor plat being granted for selling value.variance 1} front set backs from 40 feet to 24 feet, 2] rear setbacks lots 1 &2 from 30 feet to7.00 feet, 31 side yard of lot 1 from 6 feet to5,41 width to depth ratio both lots to be greater than 2.5, 51 minimum lot width for lots 1 and 2 to be reduced from 65 feet to 57 feet and 61 for lots 1 and 2 to be less than 10, 000 square feet. The current 3 family dwelling would be a one family home Mr. Holloway said that he had Darrell Brown from the Mooresville Dept.to look at the proposed area he found no problem. Terry Burnside asked if all of the property was on Lincoln Lane,the answer from Mr. Holloway was yes Lincoln Only.After the reading of the Facts of Findings, a motion to approve the 6 variances By Mike Young per the statement of Mr. Currens { if the 6 variances is granted, along with that the use of lot 1 would be restricted to single family dwelling only and all be subject to the Plan Commission granting the Minor Plat.} a second came fro Alan Kramer,the vote was 4-0 in favor of the variances. Mr. Holloway came with Ross Beyer for Kroger Food Stores;for with 5 variances for Kroger Food stores;the variances are need to build a General Business {Gas Station} 1} variance from more than one structure on a single parcel; 21 to reduce the sign setback from 50 feet to 3; 31 to allow signs with intermittent/digital display;41 for parking space; and 51 to sign area of 265 square feet to which exceeds the 184 square feet allowed.Mr. Holloway explained why all of the variances were needed. Mr.Beyer has pictures of other Gas Stations. Mrs. Whaley asked about the entrance, it was explained that it was the existing drives and there would not be any new cuts. {There was some conversation that was not on the recording about the tanks etc.} The tanks have double walls, interior alarms if there is a leak.After the reading of the facts of Findings a motion was made by Mike Young seconded by Ann Whaley to approve this variance. The vote was 4-0 with none opposed. A motion was made by Mike Young to adjourn seconded by Ann Whaley all in favor of adjourning.