My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC 2005
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2013 10:48:52 AM
Creation date
2/8/2013 10:48:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
five or six weeks and the Town might not agree with them, so this could take even <br /> longer. <br /> Commissioner Ehrhart shared with the commission the meeting with PacMore, a dry food <br /> processing plant, interested in the Davee property located at Old 67 and New 67. <br /> PacMore wanted and I-3 zoning,but the Town does not like I-3 uses, if for some reason <br /> they leave we don't want a junkyard there, as an example. An 1-2 zoning and then get a <br /> variance for twenty-four hour operation was suggested. Attorney Currens said they were <br /> moving forward with their plans and seeking matching grants. Attorney Currens had <br /> suggested to PacMore the easiest way to make this fit would be I-2 zoning and a variance <br /> for the 24 hours rather than I-3 and go for a variance for setbacks and significantly more <br /> buffering. PacMore has to get easements for rail service. They could have fifteen <br /> railroad cars sitting there at one time. <br /> Commissioner Ehrhart commented the car business on Indianapolis Road appears to be <br /> gone. But they had talked a little bit about Barlow's lot and if that was considered <br /> outside storage. Traditionally, it has not been. Attorney Currens has been keeping an eye <br /> out and probably will have to look at license plate. Joe Beikman, Building Inspector, said <br /> this was zoned B-3 under the old ordinance,but now the classification has been changed <br /> to I-1. The police could take a look at this. <br /> Another issue was a letter concerning a recreational vehicle in a driveway and people <br /> living in it. Attorney Currens thinks this violates our ordinance. He had sent a letter to <br /> Joe on this issue. He referenced Section 1-Residental in our ordinance that restricts <br /> property use to one single-family residential use. Also referenced page 12 of the <br /> ordinance recreation vehicle as a temporary dwelling for travel or vacation use only. If <br /> on a family dwelling this is in violation because there is more than one use on that <br /> property. <br /> Building Inspector, Joe Beikman, reported eight(8)permits and forty-six (46) <br /> inspections. <br /> There being no further business to come before the commission, a motion was made by <br /> Commissioner Corbin with a second by Commissioner Bryant to adjourn the meeting. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. "jr., <br /> Chairman <br /> AT :S .` <br /> S.C reta <br /> 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.