My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MARCH 15, 1989
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
MARCH 15, 1989
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:19 AM
Creation date
4/15/2003 9:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
1989-03-15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE MOORESVILLE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br /> <br /> The Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals met at its regularly <br />scheduled meeting place, the Town Hall, on Wednesday, March 15, <br />1989 at 7:00 P.M. Present were board members Robert Tucker, D~ <br />Barry, Vern Kimmel and A1 Kramer. Standing in for board attorney, <br />Timothy C. Currens, was attorney, Michael A. Ksenak. Chairman <br />Tucker noted that the public notice with regards to the Michael <br />and Deborah King petition reflected a time for the meeting at 7:30 <br />P.M. and, therefore, the meeting was adjourned until 7:30 P.M. <br />Chairman Tucker determined that a quorum was present and proceeded <br />with approval of the minutes for the February 15, 1989 meeting and <br />signed the minutes which had previously been approved for the <br />December 21, 1988 and January 18, 1989 meetings. <br /> <br /> The only item on the agenda was the application of Michael <br />and Deborah King of 95 Turner Road requesting a variance from <br />development standards to allow for the subdividing of 6.032 acre <br />tract of land located at 540 Keller Hill Road, Mooresville, <br />Indiana without the necessity of complying with the subdivision <br />control ordinance. <br /> <br /> Debbie King indicated that she and her husband were intending <br />to divide the 6.032 acre tracts into two equal tracts of 3.016 <br />acres. This would allow for a road frontage per lot of 192 feet <br />by a depth of 686.753 feet. The board noted that the code <br />requires a maximum depth to width ratio of 2.5 to 1 and that the <br />proposal called for a greater depth to width ratio of <br />approximately 3 to 1. The board noted to the petitioner that in <br />order to grant the variance from development standards with <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.