Laserfiche WebLink
pictures showing the slope on the rear of Lot No. 25 were intro- <br />duced as an exhibit. Mr. Lawson advised that the engineer, <br />Delbert Hobson, believed that any structure should be at least 10 <br />feet away from the dropoff and for this reason, there was a <br />limited type of home which could be built on this lot and also a <br />limited size home. He also advised that other lots in the area <br />would have similar problems and that the property owner of Lot No. <br />20, Mr. Crismore, and of Lot No. 21, Mr. Lockwood, had no objec- <br />tion to the request. The Board then opened the meeting up to <br />remonstrators. Mike Johnson, the owner of Lot 26, an adjoining <br />property owner, stated that he was opposed to the variance. <br /> <br />In particular, Mr. Johnson said that he had designed his house for <br />this particular lot and purchased this lot with the location of <br />his home along the tree line being a major consideration for his <br />choice of lots. Mr. Johnson stated that the Herrins purchased <br />this lot with full awareness of the drawbacks in building loca- <br />tions on it and size of homes which would fit on it. He stated <br />that he did not want to build his home in a manner that would have <br />it looking in the back door of another house, and since his house <br />would be set back seventy feet to utilize the tree line and slope <br />to his benefit, any structure with a set-back of only 25 feet <br />would enter into his view. He also stated the original owners of <br />Lot 25, Klay Builders, had a home which would have sat on this lot <br />and been within the 40 foot set-back line. <br /> <br /> Norman Connell, the owner of Lot 27, had a question as to <br />where the property would sit, and after being shown this informa- <br />tion, stated that he had no problem with the proposed variance. <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br /> <br />