DEC. 16, 1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

regarding the current zoning and was advised that the property had been residential and later rezoned Local Business after Dr. Alarcon purchased the property. Chairman Oschman then opened up the meeting to the floor. Brian Benedict, the adjoining property owner north of Dr. Alarcon advised that he lived in a house adjoining this property. He stated that his property is zoned Industrial, however, his residential use was a pre-existing one. Mr. Benedict advised that the current tenants have six children which present problems for him, including damage to his fence. He also complained of the junked vehicles, old semi and mobile home and boat. was fixed up it could be Arvin M. Hopkins, the It was his position that if the property rented for business use. property owner immediately west and south of this property then spoke. He stated that most of the area is zoned Local Business and Industrial. He felt that the children presented a problem and interference to his business use and for this reason he was against the granting of the variance. He stated that this area should remain Local Business and should be used accordingly. It was Mr. Hopkin's position that this proposed residential use would interfe~with the use of his property. Dr. Alarcon rebutted the allegations of the remonstrators stating that there are other children in the area and that the trailers referred to are for sale and the vehicles referred to do run and are for sale. At this point Chairman Oschman advised that t~e only issue is whether or not the variance for Residential use should be granted and not the outside storage or other conditions referred to. The board then proceeded to findings of fact. The board found that the approval of the variance would not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community due to --2--