My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APRIL 15, 1987
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
APRIL 15, 1987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:15 AM
Creation date
4/15/2003 9:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
1987-04-15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE MOORESVILLE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS <br /> <br /> The Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals met at its regularly scheduled <br />meeting place, the Town Hall, on Wednesday, the 15th day of April, 1987. <br />Present were Board members Steve Oschman, Wendell Thaler, Tilford Bailey, <br />Donald Barry and Warren Franklin. The Board's Attorney, Timothy C. Cu~rens, <br />was also present. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Steve Oschman <br />who determined there was a quorum present. The Board then proceeded to approve <br />the minutes and findings of fact of the March meeting. <br /> <br /> The first item on the agenda was the petition filed by Kenneth Wilcher <br /> <br />and Imogene Wilcher regarding the real property at 354 E. Washington Street, <br />Mooresville, Indiana. The Wilchers' request was to allow them to operate a <br />custom car care cleaning business in the garage located on the property. Mr. <br />Wilcher advised that all work would be done in the garage and consist of no <br />noise louder than a buffer. Healso explained that the house was over 100 feet <br />from the garage and the exact location of the area in the town. Mr. Wilcher <br />also advised that he would like some type of small sign to be positioned on the <br />garage itself. After a discussion by the Board the Chairman asked for findings <br />of fact. In discussion the Board found the following: <br /> <br /> 1. That the approval would not be injurious to the public health, safety, <br />morals and general welfare of the community in that this use was compatible with <br />the other businesses in the area and would take place on the interior of the <br />garage. <br /> <br /> 2. That the use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in <br /> the variance would not be affected in a substantially adverse manner due to other <br /> similiar business uses in that area and the proximity to the business area zoned <br /> on Indainapolis Road and Main Street. <br /> <br /> 3. That the need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar <br /> <br /> to the property involved, namely, the length of the lots and their location to <br /> <br />business uses. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.