JAN. 27, 1987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-6- frames per day maximum and that they build only what is ordered. Bruce Kraver, an employee of Mrs. Manning, advised that he had been shot in the head and was disabled to the point of not being able to use his left hand and left leg. He advised that he could not work anywhere else and needed this job for income. A Mrs. Day also advised that this was her sole employment and that her husband was disabled and unemployed. The Board turned to the floor and inquired whether any remonstrators were present. Jerry Mayfield advised that he h~d filed the original complaint against the Mannings. He also informed the Board that there were covenants in the deeds re- stricting this type of operation. When his complaint was originally filed it took the Mannings a long time to clean up the property. He advised that the home is now in worse shape than it has ever been. He advised that the building in the back yard was a pole barn and is not conducive to single family dwelling area. Traffic also parked on the side of the street with no parking posted. Mr. Mayfield said the question is whether a business should be allowed to operate there at all, not whether the Board should allow a business for the handicapped. Sherry Stewart asked the Board if the variance was granted what authority did they have to keep the property in good condition. Steve Oschman indicated that the Board could impose restrictions on the granting of this variance. Mr. Mayfield advised that it took 5 months before to clean up the sawdust and he feels the Board cannot enforce their restrictions. Mitzie Forbes advised the appearance of the property in question was not in keeping with the neighborhood. She has observed outside storage and the driveway is full of mud. Mr. Mayfield advised that the Board should at least go out and look at the property and Mr. Stewart agreed. Ros Stovall advised that the Mannings w~u~d create a drive with gravel