SEPT. 17, 1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE MOORESVILLE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS The Mooresvi]le Board of Zoning Appeals met at its regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, the 17th day of September, 1986, at the Mooresville Town Hall. Present were Board Members Steve Oschman, Tilford Bailey, Donald Barry and Warren Franklin. The Board's Attorney, Timothy C. Currens, was also present. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Steve Oschman who determined there was a quorum present. The Board then proceeded to approve the minutes of the prior meeting and the findings of fact. The ne~t item on the Board's agenda was the petition filed by Labsonics, Inc. for s variance from the current zoning use. Present for Labsonics, Inc. was attorney David Gray. The Board's Attorney found that the notices were in order. Mr. Gray proceeded to show the Board a sketch of the property in question, which is owned by Delvi~ Williams, and what portion of the property they would purchase and use for a paved parking lot. Mrs. Mazola Downing was present and had a question on where the cars would enter the lot. The Board then asked Jf there were apy additional remonstrators present or any persons having questions regarding the request. There being none the Board proceeded to a discussion of tbis variance. The Board found that the approval would not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the community due to the existing uses in this area which are compatible. (2) That the use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance would not be substantially affected in an adverse manner due to the industrial uses in this proximity and other parking areas. (3) That the need from the variance arose from the location of this property bordering on industrial and residential uses with the division of the property being compatible only for this type of use, being a portion of a residential property yet bordering the industrial area. (4) That the strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance would constitute an unnecessary hardship if applied to this property in that rezoning of the same would be detrimental to the residential uses