Laserfiche WebLink
-7- <br /> <br />might be a safety factor regarding the business location off the highway. <br /> <br />The Board then proceeded to a discussion of the variance from development <br />standards and Wendell Thaler stated that at the first meeting although counsel <br /> <br />Sam Korn did not speak well due to laryngitis, they did initiate a compromise <br />allowing the business contingent upon no advertising. That since that date <br />there has been a sign present repeatedly and believes a sign would decrease <br />property values. The Board further discussed the development standards finding <br />that the approval would not be necessarily injurious to the public health, safety, <br />morals or general welfare of the community. They found that the use and value of <br />the area adjacent to the property included in the variance would be affected in <br />a substantially adverse manner in that in this residential area property values <br />would be affected, injuring the adjacent property owners. The Board found that <br />the strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance would not particularly <br />result in any practical difficulties in the use of the property in question. <br /> <br />The Chairman then entertained a motion from the floor and at this time Attorney <br />Stovall requested a continuance to determine an alternate sign or evidence on <br />property values. Steve Oschman again opened this up to the Board and Tilford <br />Bailey made a motion to deny the request for a variance and not to continue the <br />matter. This was seconded by Don Barry and unanimously passed. There being <br />no further business to come before the Board the meeting was adjourned upon <br />motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried. <br /> <br />St~ Oschman, L~airman <br /> <br />, Secretary <br /> <br /> <br />