Laserfiche WebLink
FINDINGS OF FACT <br />Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals <br /> <br />Re: Variance Request of Stephen A. Edwards, <br /> Cheryl Edwards, and Dorothea Edwards, <br /> 292 W. Harrison Street, Mooresville, IN <br /> <br />46158 <br /> <br /> This matter came before the Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals on <br />Wednesday, February 19, 1986, at the regularly scheduled meeting date and time. <br />The petition requested a variance from the zoning ordinance, in particular, a <br />variance with reference to north and south side setback lines, if any, in order <br />to extend the existing walls of the existing building to the west towards <br />Harrison Avenue, as such side setback lines would be affected with reference <br />to the real estate located north of Lot #11, and as it would affect the <br />extension of this building on and across Lot #12 to the south. <br /> <br /> The Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals, having heard evidence on the <br /> <br />above captioned petition now makes the following findings of fact pursuant to <br />Indiana Code 36-7-4-918.5: <br /> <br /> 1. That the approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, <br />morals and general welfare of the community due to the location of the existing <br />structures and proposed structures on the respective Lots #11 and #12, and in <br />the adjoining property. <br /> <br /> 2. That the use and value of the area adjacent to the property included <br /> <br /> in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner due to <br /> the other businesses in the area and the fact that this is currently general <br /> business and the property affected is owned by one of the petitioners. Further, <br /> that this land would be sold as a unit according to the petitioners. <br /> <br /> 3. That the strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance will <br /> result in practical difficulties in the use of the property due to the property <br /> already existing so close to the respective property lines and with the general <br /> business zoning classification any other use of the property would not be practical. <br /> <br /> j~7'~ ~~man <br /> <br />Secretary Dated: <br /> <br /> <br />