My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FEB. 19, 1986
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
FEB. 19, 1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:16 AM
Creation date
4/15/2003 9:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
1986-02-19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF FACT <br />Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals <br /> <br />Re: Variance Request of Stephen A. Edwards, <br /> Cheryl Edwards, and Dorothea Edwards, <br /> 292 W. Harrison Street, Mooresville, IN <br /> <br />46158 <br /> <br /> This matter came before the Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals on <br />Wednesday, February 19, 1986, at the regularly scheduled meeting date and time. <br />The petition requested a variance from the zoning ordinance, in particular, a <br />variance with reference to north and south side setback lines, if any, in order <br />to extend the existing walls of the existing building to the west towards <br />Harrison Avenue, as such side setback lines would be affected with reference <br />to the real estate located north of Lot #11, and as it would affect the <br />extension of this building on and across Lot #12 to the south. <br /> <br /> The Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals, having heard evidence on the <br /> <br />above captioned petition now makes the following findings of fact pursuant to <br />Indiana Code 36-7-4-918.5: <br /> <br /> 1. That the approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, <br />morals and general welfare of the community due to the location of the existing <br />structures and proposed structures on the respective Lots #11 and #12, and in <br />the adjoining property. <br /> <br /> 2. That the use and value of the area adjacent to the property included <br /> <br /> in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner due to <br /> the other businesses in the area and the fact that this is currently general <br /> business and the property affected is owned by one of the petitioners. Further, <br /> that this land would be sold as a unit according to the petitioners. <br /> <br /> 3. That the strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance will <br /> result in practical difficulties in the use of the property due to the property <br /> already existing so close to the respective property lines and with the general <br /> business zoning classification any other use of the property would not be practical. <br /> <br /> j~7'~ ~~man <br /> <br />Secretary Dated: <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.