DEC. 19, 1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

FINDINGS OF FACT OF THE MOORESVILLE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS RE: R. Alan McConnell Property in buffer zone off State Road 267 North of Mooresville, Indiana This matter came before the Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals on Wednesday, December 19, 1984, at the regularly scheduled meeting date and time. The petition requested a variance from the use standards of the property described in the attached legal description to the petition. In particular, the request was to allow the placement of a mobile home on said real property for a period of five (5) years to be used as a personal residence by R. Alan McConnell. The request also was for a variance from the development standards on said property to allow the mobile home to be placed on said property without a permanent foundation and concrete footings. The Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals, having heard evidence on the above captioned petition, now makes the following findings of fact pursuant to Indiana Code 36-7-4-918.4: 1. That the approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the cormnunity in that said mobile home should not affect any of the surrounding area, it being located on 7.65 acres of ground and Mr. McConnell does own other ground in the area. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner in that Mr. McConnell owns surrounding ground and the mobile home will be for a limited use of five (5) years. 3. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property involved in that said property is not located near city sewers or streets and construction will take some period of time for completion. 4. That strict application of the terms of the zoning ordinance will constitute an unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought in that the special exception for a mobile home would require a permanent special exception for that use versus the limited five-year use granted. 5. The approval does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan adopted under the 500 series of this chapter of the Indiana Code in that the use will continue to be substantially residentual, single family dwelling.