Laserfiche WebLink
1. That there are exceptional and extraordinary <br /> circumstances or conditions applicable to the <br /> property of the petitioners and to the intended <br /> use that does not apply generally to the other <br /> property or class of use in the same vicinity <br /> and in the district in which it is located. <br /> <br /> 2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation <br /> and enjoyment of a substantial property right <br /> possessed by other property in the same vicinity <br /> and district which would be denied to the property <br /> in question if such variance was not granted. <br /> <br /> 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially <br /> deterimental to the public welfare or injurious to the <br /> property or improvements in the vacinity and district <br /> in which the subject property is located. <br /> <br /> 4. That granting of such variance will not alter the land <br /> <br /> use characteristics of the vicinity and the district <br /> in which such property is located or diminish the <br /> marketable value of adjacent land and the improvements <br /> or cause or add to additional traffic congestion to the <br /> public streets in the area where the improvements are <br /> to be made in accordance with the granting of the variance. <br /> <br />Thereafter, Nan Kollmeyer made a motion to grant the variance as requested, said <br />motion was seconded by Wendell Thaler and the vote was 5 members for, and no <br />members against the motion as presented. This representing a majority of the <br />Board Members the variance was granted. There being no further business to <br /> <br /> <br />