Laserfiche WebLink
which would be facing his current business. There being no remonstrators <br />present and no further questions from the floor, Chairman Oschman opened up <br />the Board to any additional discussion. <br /> <br /> Wendell Thaler then proceeded to make the following findings: <br /> <br /> 1. That there are exceptional and extraordinary <br /> circumstances or conditions applicable to the <br /> property of the petitioners and to the intended <br /> use that does not apply generally to the other <br /> property or class of use in the sam~ vicinity <br /> and in the district in which it is located. <br /> <br /> 2. That the varianc~ is n~cessary for the preservation <br /> and enjoyment of a substantial property right <br /> possessed by other property in the same vicinity <br /> and district if such variance was not granted. <br /> <br /> 3. That the granting of such varimnce will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the <br /> property or improvements in the vicinity and district <br /> in which the subject property is located. <br /> <br /> 4. That granting of such varianc~ will not alter the land <br /> use characteristics of the vicinity and the district <br /> in which such property is located or diminish the <br /> marketable value of adjacent land and the improvements <br /> or cause or add to additional traffic congestion to the <br /> public streets in the area where the improvements are <br /> <br /> to be made in accordance with the granting of the variance. <br /> <br /> and moved that the variance be granted to allow the reduced set-back on the <br /> <br /> <br />