Laserfiche WebLink
2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation <br /> <br /> and enjoyment of a substantial property right <br /> possessed by other property in the same vicinity <br /> and district if such variance was not granted. <br /> <br /> 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the <br /> property or improvements in the vicinity and district <br /> in which the subject property is located. <br /> <br /> 4. That granting of such variance will not alter the land <br /> use characteristics of the vicinity and the district <br /> in which such property is located or diminish the <br /> marketable value of adjacent land and the improvements <br /> or cause or add to additional traffic congestion to the <br /> public streets in the area where the improvements are <br /> <br />to be made in accordance with the granting of the variance. <br />and moved that the variance be granted to allow for a 7 foot set back on the <br />back property line for the mini-barn on the property located at 598 Indianapolis <br />Road and to allow construct~n to be completed as set out in the drawings. This <br />was seconded by Paul Walters and unanimously approved. <br /> <br /> There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting <br />was adjourned upon motion duly made and seconded. <br /> <br /> Steve Oschman, Chairman <br /> <br />, Secretary <br /> <br />Dated: <br /> <br /> <br />