Laserfiche WebLink
2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation <br /> <br /> and enjoyment of a substantial property right <br /> possessed by other property in the same vicinity <br /> and district which would be denied to the property <br /> in question if such variance was not granted. <br /> <br /> 3. ~fhat the granting of such variance will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the <br /> property or improvements in the vicinity and district <br /> in which the subject property is located. <br /> <br /> 4. That granting of such variance will not alter the land <br /> <br /> use characteristics of the vicinity and the district <br /> in which such property is located or diminish the <br /> marketable value of adjacent land and the improvements <br /> or cause or add to additional traffic congestion to the <br /> public streets in the area where the improvements are <br /> to be made in accordance with the granting of the variance. <br /> <br />Thereafter Wendell Thaler moved that the variance be granted allowing the 20 foot <br />set back on Main Street and the 5 foot set back on the east side of the building <br />adjacent to the alleyway. This was seconded by Warren Franklin and unanimously <br />approved by the Board. <br /> <br /> The Board then proceeded to Case Number 4-1983 which was filed by R. C. Fields <br />and Mildred Fields requesting a variance to allow the erection of a 24 foot by 26 foot <br />detached garage with a rear yard set back of 16 feet on the property located at <br />132 West Washington Street, Mooresville, Indiana. Present were the Fields along <br />with Judy Arterberry of Smith Brothers Builders and Supply, Inc. Mr. Fields explained <br />that his garage had burned down and he was erecting a replacement garage in <br /> <br /> <br />