Laserfiche WebLink
of the application presented as the parcel numbers do not match the <br />particular property being discussed. Mr. Williams, Mr. Moench and <br />members of the board discussed the parcel and parcel numbers in <br />question. Attorney Mel Daniel stated that with the inconsistence any <br />approved motion could be appealed. It was determined that an <br />amended application needed to be filed, corrected notices sent out but <br />no additional filing fee would be charged, Mike Young called for a <br />motion to continue, the motion was made, seconded and approved. <br />The next item on the agenda is a two lot minor plat at 650 E Tincher <br />Rd. presented by Bryan Haggard of Banning Engineering. The <br />request is to have ae lot divided into 2 lots; lot 1 at 4.770 acres and lot <br />2 at 14.846. This would allow for the building of a second home on <br />the property. When no questions or concerns were made Jeff <br />Dieterlen made a motion to approve the minor plat, Perry King <br />seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. <br />The next items on the agenda are a replat and rezone request of the <br />46.685 acres at E Keller Hill Rd and L Long Meadow Ln. The <br />requester, presented by John Larrison of Holloway Engineering are to <br />vacate the 9 lot minor plat and to rezone from PUD R to AG. The <br />replat request, if approved would result in the 3 lots: lot 1 at 35.41, lot <br />2 at 5.0 and lot 3 at 2.36. Mr. Larrison noted that lot 10 of the original <br />Long Meadow PUD would remain as it is not part of the 46.685 <br />purchased by Jerry Reecer. Mike Young called for questions. Jeff <br />Dieterlen questioned the need for the rezone as with lot 10 there <br />would still be 4 lots to comprise a PUD. John Littlejohn of the <br />audience discussed private road concerns, inquired as to which lot <br />would be farmed, and where houses would be located. Additional <br />audience members expressed concerns for the road and water run-off. <br />John Larrsion reviewed with the Commission and audience that 3 lots <br />verses 9 would reduce the the number of homes, drives ways and <br />allow for more open ground area. Steve Knieper stated that while he <br />understands both sides, he would rather see 3 lots with an Ag zoning. <br />Tammy VanHook asked audience members if any had a concern with <br />