My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Plan Comm 10-08-2020
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
2020
>
Plan Comm 10-08-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2021 2:28:13 PM
Creation date
1/15/2021 2:18:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mooresville Planning Commission, October 8, 2020 <br />Commission and Town Council. Mike Young asked her to bring forward her comments when the rezoning was <br />considered, which would be next on the agenda. Mark Taylor made the motion to approve the replat, Perry King <br />seconded, and motion carried with 6 votes to 1 (Kimberly Scofield) against. <br />Ross Holloway Engineering then addressed the Planning Commission, requesting a rezone from I2 to B3, stating <br />the slides shown during the Board of Zoning Appeals meeting were irrelevant. John Robinson asked Mr. <br />Holloway why he believed the slides were irrelevant. Mr. Holloway stated that there was "no use of discussing <br />something that may not happen". He asked the rhetorical question if B3 were less or more of burden to bordering <br />residents and stated that he believed it was, He then read a long list of uses from the Use Matrix of the UDO <br />provided by the aforementioned Mr. Fenway, and then stated that few residential areas have industrial zoned next <br />to residential and that B3 commercial was more appropriate. Mike Young asked if B3 zoning restricted outside <br />storage. RHE replied that if the zoning change were granted by the Planning Commission and the Town Council <br />approves the change, then RHE and Mr. Mattingly would apply to the BZ,A for a variance. Kimberly Scofield <br />asked about the demand for self -storage in the area, and Mr. Holloway replied that demand for storage is <br />irrelevant to a straight -up zoning request. JV stated that the Mooresville UDO lays out 12 zoning allows outdoor <br />material storage that is screened from view. B3 zoning applies to retail sales along high -traffic corridors. Mike <br />Young asked if all other B3 uses would not be allowed on this properly. RHE responded that "there would be no <br />other use than B3". That the future owner would live within the requirements of B3 to develop the storage units, <br />and use would be restricted to self -storage. <br />Mrs. Brockmeyer then addressed the Planning Commission, stating that she had spoken at length with many <br />people in town. She believed that there could be another buyer of the property who would donate the land to the <br />community. She stated that she and her neighbors did not want storage units in their backyard, that there were <br />many children, and some special needs children in her neighborhood for whom this would be a danger. She stated <br />she had asked Mr. Mattingly for concessions in their discussions such as fences surrounding the property or <br />simply the maintenance of the existing fence located on the property, a landscaped mound, restricted hours of <br />operations, a manned kiosk in the center instead of key card or key pad access, and he rejected all concessions. <br />She asked rhetorically who would neighbors call with complaints of insects or lighting? She stated that the <br />Greenwood self -storage property owned and operated by Mr. Mattingly (and used as an example by RHE in their <br />slide presentation) has a 7 -foot high fence surrounding it with residential neighborhoods on 2 sides, that he was <br />required to build by the City of Greenwood. She also stated that the residents still had questions regarding run-off <br />and property values. RHE responded that there is a misconception that self -storage units are not allowed on I2. <br />12 would allow outside storage for goods and transportation. He showed a slide for 12 zoning that stated that no <br />variances were required to build other than stormwater and building permits. Beth Copeland told Mr. Holloway <br />that the Town of Mooresville still had to agree on the definition and uses of I2, and that he was speaking as if his <br />definition were a guarantee. Mr. Holloway then threatened the town with legal action. Mike Young then cut off <br />this debate. <br />Lauren Sparks of 1073 Dellawood Drive stated that she lives on the southside of the property where the retention <br />pond would be located, and that she has a two-year-old and a five-year-old. She is very concerned for their safety <br />if the existing fence is not fixed, or a new fence built. As well, she pointed out, if the property is rezoned B3, <br />lights will be shining over the fence into neighboring homes on the south side of the property. Mark Taylor stated <br />that he had talked to Bobbie Brockmeyer, and that if the property were developed under I2, then there would be <br />outside storage. If rezoned B3, there will be no outside storage allowed. Mike Young called for calm, and asked <br />the public to be silent, and then stated he was open for a motion. Beth Copeland stated that one option would be <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.