Plan Comm 10-08-2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mooresville Planning Commission, October 8, 2020 to send the request to the Town Council with no recommendation. Perry King made this motion, Mark Taylor seconded, and 3 votes were counted in favor. Kim Scofield then made the motion to send to the Town Council with an unfavourable recommendation, but no member seconded. Perry King stated that the property had been zoned industrial for years, making it very valuable. Mark Taylor then made the motion to send the rezoning request to the Town Council with a favourable recommendation with restriction for self -storage only. Again, no second, and Mike Young called the motion dead. Kimberly Scofield asked Mr. Mattingly if he already owned the property and his response was muffled, but it was apparent he had not yet purchased the property. Mike Young then stated that if there was no motion to deny, then discussion would continue. Perry King renewed his motion to send to the Town Council with no recommendation. Mark Taylor seconded, and the motion was passed unanimously. Mr. and Mrs. St John of 10073 North David Lane requested permission to put a travel trailer on their property as their house had burned and reconstruction would take 8-10 months, Beth Copeland responded that the request had to be tabled, as she was unaware of legal precedent or procedure for this request, Next on the agenda RHE requested modifications of PUD Zoning Commitments for property located at East Hadley Road (Previously approved Ordinance No. 11-2006). hr summary, modifications requested are: 1) A name change from Eagle Crossing to Grand Oaks 2) Land Use and Building Type (list not inclusive of all changes) a. Under previous covenant, homes were to be built with crawl space or basement, and no less than 1,800 square feet of living space, Requesting change to slab construction and no less than 1,500 square feet. b. Under previous covenant, homes were to be of brick and or stone facing and quality building materials. Mr. Holloway showed photos of homes of "architectural quality" stating that vinyl building materials had changed over the last 14 years, and all homes would be of quality construction as determined by the developer. c. Roof pitch of not less than 8/12 changed to not less than 6/12 d. Eave overhang of 18 inches changed to 12 inches 3) Mailboxes (NOTE: language on item #21 "Mailboxes" appears to be identical) 4) A Lot Owners' Association and Covenants for Maintenance and Special Assessments (detailed in paperwork) Mike Young made comments regarding the development Lakeside as a mostly masonry community that is a high- end development that has taken more than 20 years to fully develop. Mr. Young asked the developer if he were trying to hit another market, which was confirmed. Jeff Dieterlen asked if these changes were not incorporated into the development of the homes, what would the price point be? The developer indicated that the price point target was $235,000 and if the changes were not approved, it would cost $25,000 - $35,000 more for each home. Beth Copeland asked how many homes had been built under the previous commitment. Ross Holloway responded that the development of the newly named Grand Oaks would bean 8 -phase project. He stated no homes had been built under the previous commitment. Mike Young called for public comment or questions. Nila Turley of 4833 East Hadley Road stated she had spoken to her neighbors and most were opposed to this development. Many were concerned about traffic on Hadley Road already. She did not have a list of grievances to address. Brian Turley of 13342 Allison Drive,