My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Plan Comm 03-11-2021
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
2021
>
Plan Comm 03-11-2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2021 2:38:45 PM
Creation date
5/14/2021 1:41:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Public Documents
Meeting Minute Type
Plan Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mooresville Planning Commission, March 11, 2021 <br />1. Grandview residents have consistently trespassed on their property and even hunted on their property <br />without permission. Grandview property owners have cut down their fence, and mowed their grass. She <br />requested that the developers erect a fence barrier. <br />2. Surface water drainage flows onto her property because of a natural declivity, but no natural drainage. <br />3. As a 46 -year resident of Mooresville who attended many meetings on the approved 2006 PUD -R she <br />believes that quality is the primary consideration for this development <br />In addition, Ms. Mathers pointed out that Mr. Holloway's comparative home pricing slides did not show <br />Heartland Crossing, where homes are in a similar price range, which means less diversity in home options. She <br />read an article from Monday January 5, 2021 in which Noblesville planners realized they did not have the <br />diversity of housing options to attract young people and older retirees — middle income housing was missing from <br />the long-term plan. She stated that Mooresville has spent millions of dollars to enhance the perception of this <br />community, and lesser quality housing did not go along with the Town's efforts. <br />Brian Turley made similar statements regarding the efforts of the Community, the Planning Commission and <br />surrounding homeowners to reach an agreement in 2006, and believes lowering the bar is still inappropriate for <br />the community. He provided a copy of a Protest Petition with over 130 signatures of Mooresville residents. <br />Jim Cottongim asked if Mr. Holloway had checked with the Fire Department regarding houses six feet apart with <br />vinyl siding. He stated that "the whole row will be caught on fire before the [Fire] Department gets there." He <br />provided an anecdote that his grandson's shed had caught on fire and melted the vinyl siding off his house over 25 <br />feet away. <br />Lynn Rose stated she lived across the street from the proposed development and asked if anyone had addressed <br />access to Hadley Road. She stated that Hadley Road looks like a garbage dump given current traffic flow. She <br />requested information on the entrance and exit points of the development and asked that the developer consider a <br />smaller quantity of homes. <br />Jeff Dieterlen called for any additional questions from the Planning Commission, and then invited Mr. Holloway <br />to respond to the questions and comments of the public. Mr. Holloway made the following points in response: <br />• Mooresville has spent millions over the last 10 years upgrading the sanitary sewer plant. This proposed - <br />development will be serviced by a sewer that runs through the property. This issue would have to <br />addressed during the platting and planning phase. <br />• Quality is in the eye of the beholder. These homes might be of a higher quality than the surrounding <br />homes. The images shown as examples of what the homes might look like. <br />• These are not starter homes. Per our presentation, a person with a median income could not live in this <br />development; it would take a two -income household. This is not low-income housing. <br />• Markets, income, and our community has changed since 2006. "This property has sat for 15 years and no <br />one has asked us to develop it." Karrington Estates is a "vinyl village" <br />• Water and drainage concerns will be addressed during the final plat-stormwater ordinance states that the <br />runoff must be less after development. Current runoff is from agricultural activities; when the property is <br />developed, runoff will be less. <br />• Traffic and drainage will be addressed at the time of final platting. <br />• Based on what we know now, there will be no changes in density to the plat of 2006 — numbers quoted do <br />not take into consideration roads and retention ponds. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.