Laserfiche WebLink
basic floor plans with varying exteriors. David Sadler asked why the floor plans and the exteriors were <br />not shown earlier. Beth Copeland asked if the builder was making a commitment that the homes shown <br />would be representative, and Mr. Holloway responded yes. Mike Young called for a motion and Jeff <br />Dieterlen made the motion for an unfavorable recommendation to the Mooresville Town Council, <br />Kimberly Schofield seconded, and the motion was approved with a 6 to 1 vote. <br />Next on the agenda was the rezoning from 11 to R1D for 73 single family homes on 27.4 acres at County <br />Line and Ferguson roads. The builder would be willing to comply with a traffic study request during the <br />plat submittal. David Sadler asked if the property were currently served by city water and sewer, and <br />Mr. Holloway responded yes, that city sewer runs along the north side of the property, and a large water <br />main on County Line Road would be extended to service this property. Jeff Dieterlen asked why less <br />than 2 years ago the property was rezoned to Il with testimony that the best use was consistent with <br />the Mooresville Comprehensive Plan, and now another rezone is being requested. Mr. Holloway <br />responded that the property did not sell as Il. Some additional debate on lot size, masonry, square <br />footage of homes and traffic ensued. A representative of the builder, Tom Height stated that the homes <br />were similar to the homes built in the North Madison Crossing development, called the Legacy series. <br />Mr. Holloway stated that these homes are of a higher quality that the homes across Ferguson Road. <br />David Sadler asked if the builder would commit to R1C because of the minimum size of the homes. Mr. <br />Holloway stated that no, 73 homes was the necessary density to make the project feasible. Josh Brown <br />asked why if the price of building materials has skyrocketed, why not wait, and develop R1B. Mr. Height <br />again addressed the Commission stating that inflated costs from supply chain disruption are only a <br />portion of the increase in building and housing costs, and no abatement of fuel prices and labor <br />shortages is seen in the near future. David Sadler asked if the builder were to request R1C, how many <br />fewer lots would be developed, and Ross Holloway stated 20% fewer. Mike Young called for public <br />comment. <br />Beverly Ney expressed concerns regarding housing density and traffic on Ferguson Road. Sharon Tirey <br />spoke for the Allison family stating that two years ago it was recommended to rezone to 11 after <br />significant due diligence and consultation with experts. Although the property has been marketed, it is <br />not selling at 11. Mike Young asked Ms. Tirey with whom she had consulted to determine best use was <br />11 two years ago, and she responded Ross Holloway and Mike Dellinger of the Morgan County Economic <br />Development Corporation. Mr. Dellinger addressed the Commission and stated that the MCEDC had <br />hoped for the sale of the property zoned Il, but this had not happened. He hoped this clarified the <br />situation. Charles McGuire stated that the lot size and the density of this particular development was a <br />surprise to his son, an architect. Beth Copeland requested a clarification on commitments and Mr. <br />Holloway stated a minimum of 1,524 SF for one-story or less and the front fa4ade masonry or brick. <br />Mike Young called for a motion, and David Sadler made the motion for a favorable recommendation <br />with stipulation of minimum SF of 1,524. Robert Alumbaugh seconded, and the motion did not carry. <br />Jeff Dieter Len motioned for an unfavorable recommendation and Kimberly Schofield seconded, and the <br />motion passed with a 5 to 1 vote with 1 abstention. <br />David Gilman addressed the Planning Commission for his client Dennis Zelay, with a request to approve <br />a concept plan and a rezone at 10015 Old State Road 67. Two parcels make up this property, one 1 -acre <br />parcel is 11 for Mr. Zelay's masonry business. Mr. Zelay's single family home sits on the agricultural <br />portion of the property and Mr. Zelay wishes to build a detached garage for his residence. The two <br />issues are the rezoning of 0.1096 acres back to agricultural to build the garage for the residence, and the <br />