My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
JANUARY 9, 2003
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Board Of Zoning Appeals
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
JANUARY 9, 2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:11:07 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 10:37:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BZA
BZA - Type
Minutes
DATE
2003-01-09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
years ago the problem has gotten worse. Mr. Crouch asked if them was a valley there <br />that flows to the east and Mr. Curry said the water come down the alley from High Street <br />to South Street and at the comer of his property them is a drain that the town put in on the <br />east side in the last six to nine months. And this has not helped. Mr. Crouch asked Mr. <br />Holloway if he knew which way the water flowed and Mr. Holloway said the water <br />flowed from the north to the south, except when if gets to the alley if flattens out and part <br />of the problem is some of the building in the area are built low. Mr. Curry said his lot <br />was the lowest on South Street. <br /> <br />Mr. Holloway said to address Mr. Curry cOncerns, that when this gets to the Minor <br />Platting that Mooresville does have an ordinance that they cannot increase the down <br />stream discharge. They have enough area between the proposed house and the existing <br />house to create a small retention area to contain the small water that they might crea'4~ by <br />the construction of the proposed house. Granted that there is no place to take it to, but <br />that is where the water goes now. They propose instead of trying to shed it off on Mr. <br />Curry or even the neighbors to the north to retain the water on their site. To make this <br />aesthetically pleasing and workable they might have to put in a stone bed, like a large dry <br />well area. <br /> <br />Mr. Crouch asked Mr. Holloway if he was familiar with the drain that Mr. Curry spoke of <br />and he said he was. He said in photo number 5 you can see the drain. A few years ago <br />the town had a project, in fact hired them to write some easements to construct a storm <br />pipe from South Street down over the hill to the creek. He does not know how well these <br />function, frankly by looking at the location it is high and Mr. Curry's dwelling is Iow, <br />lower than the drain, so the drain does not do a whole lot of good. Mr. Crouch stated that <br />the water for the proposed dry well had no place to go except underground. Mr. <br />Holloway said that was what happens to everything up and down the alley and South <br />Street, if it can't go down the pipe it goes underground. <br /> <br />Mr. Curry asked if the town had put in a drain from South Street to the Shopping Center. <br />Mr. Holloway said they have several years ago. Mr. Curry said it had not helped. Mr. <br />Currens stated that that drain helped certain areas, but Mr. Cunry's house was so low that <br />it did not help him. <br /> <br />Mr. Tom Moody, 126 W. South Street, said he went along with Mr. Curry, his lot and the <br />lot next to his gets flooded when it rains. He stated that the drain did not do any good. <br />He asked if they were proposing to build a double, and was told it will be a single-family <br />dwelling. Mr. Currens said the property was not going to be rezoned; it will still be <br />single family. <br /> <br />Under the Finding of Facts Mr. Barry said the water issue was still a problem to him. Mr. <br />Swisher asked if the construction would increase the water problem. Mr. Barry said there <br />was precedence for the problem in the area. Mr. Holloway said they would stipulate as <br />part of the variance it be require that they not only provide for the drainage ordinances <br />with drainage easement, but that they must construct some kind of retention system that <br />will keep the extra water that they might generate from going on the adjacent lands. Mr. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.