JULY 8, 2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the sign being up, but he is afraid that the sign at the far end of the parking lot would not be attractive. Mr. Barry asked why couldn't they put the sign on the Broad alley corner. Mr. Cable said moving the sign to the other corner was more favorable. Mr. Young asked why they would be removing the trees and Mr. Cable said there were a couple of reasons. One the trees are quite huge and in a storm they would be damaged anyway. Two they are uprooting the sidewalk and they would be replacing the sidewalk making it look better. They want to replace them with their own landscape for reasons of visibility, will make the site look freshly developed and brought up to standard, and will help stop a lot of debris from falling onto the highway causing traffic hazards. Mr. Barry asked if they have any objections to moving the sign to the south west corner of the lot and Mr. Cable stated he would need to talk to his client, he did not feel there was a problem moving it to the mid point of the property, but he was not sure about the south west corner. Mr. Cable said for the record that in some areas Family Video carry a selected area for some videos and they have determined that for this location there will not be a selected video area. After reading the fact-of-finding for the variance of developmental standards Mr. Kramer asked for a motion to approve or deny a variance for setbacks. Motion to approve a variance for setbacks from twenty feet to eleven-half feet along the alley way was made by Don Barry, second by Christopher Crouch. Motion carried 5-0. Mr. Kramer asked for a motion for the square footage of the building. Motion to approve the variance for square footage of the building from 5,000 to 6,160 square feet was made by Christopher Crouch, second by Don Barry. Motion carried 5-0. Mr. Kramer asked for a motion for the variance of signage. Motion to approve the variance for signage larger than 100 sq. ft maximum allowable; one sign is 100 sq. ft. plus the sign on the face of the building, which will be centered on the building, and the one sign will be located on the tenth parking space from the north was made by Don Barry, second by Christopher Crouch. Motion carried 4-1, with Alan Kramer opposing. Motion to restrict the petitioner from having adult programming was made by Don Barry, second by Mike Young. Motion carried 5-0. There being no further business a motion to adjourn was made by Don Barry, second by Mike Young. Motion carried 5-0. The next meeting of the Mooresville Board of Zoning Appeals will be August 12, 2004 at 7:00 PM at the Mooresville Town Hall. ¿Zed-.-, / ~ Chairman