My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
JAN. 28, 1993
Town-of-Mooresville
>
PUBLIC DOCUMENTS ON LINE
>
MINUTES
>
Plan Commission
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
JAN. 28, 1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2005 10:12:51 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 11:50:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Commission
NAME
JAN. 23, 1993
Plan Commission - Type
Minutes
DATE
1993-01-23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />t <br />~ <br />I - <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />........ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'--' <br /> <br />, -' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />shallow soil had been impaired, The results of the VOC analysis did indicate the presence <br />of methylene chloride at 6 ug/kg, however, it should be noted that methylene chloride is a <br />common laboratory artifact and the presence of this analyte does not indicate impairment <br />of the shallow soil. Records were also found indicating that confirmatory soil samples were <br />obtained from the area of the paint wash-up solution spill, and were submitted for <br />laboratory MEK analysis. The results of the confirmatory soil samples did not indicate the <br />presence of MEK above the quantitation limit. ATEC collected three (3) soil samples from <br />the septic field area and submitted them for laboratory analysis for chromium, pH and the <br />VOCs MEK and toluene. The results of these laboratory analyses did not indicate that the <br />soils in the septic field area had been impaired by a release of chromic acid solution, MEK <br />or toluene. <br /> <br />A TEC noted that several of the product and waste storage drums lacked proper labels <br />indicating the contents of the drum. EP A regulations require that all drums receiving waste <br />be clearly marked, Also accumulation dates were often absent on drums accumulating <br />hazardous waste, Inspection of the drum staging area along the eastern side of the main <br />building found several drums on the ground surface. ATEC recommends that all drums <br />containing product or waste material should be properly labeled and staged in a diked area. <br /> <br />A large number of empty drums were also noted around the site, many of which were open <br />to the environment. It has been ATEC's experience that the presence of a large quantity <br />of drums can attract unnecessary and negative public and IDEM attention to the facility. <br />A TEC recommends that all empty drums should be properly removed from the site. <br /> <br />Stained areas were noted within the drum staging area located east of the main building. <br />This staining was light in color and appeared to be paint. Oil staining in the vicinity of the <br />drums collecting the oil and water being discharged from the air compressor was also noted <br />in this area. Soil samples collected from the area surrounding the oil/water drums were <br />submitted for laboratory TPH analysis. The results of this analysis did not indicate the <br />presence of TPHs above the quantitation limit of 10 ug/Kg. Carbon from a carbon filter <br />was also noted outside of the southern door of the main building. ATEC recommends that <br />the carbon be cleaned up and properly disposed of off site. <br /> <br />A TEC reviewed the IDEM Solid/Hazardous Waste files to identify any landfills in the <br />vicinity of the site, The subject site was not listed and no such facilities were identified <br />within a one mile radius of the site. <br /> <br />ATEC reviewed IDEM Underground Storage Tank (UST) files to identify properties within <br />a one-half mile radius of the site with registered USTs. One (1) facility was referenced as <br />having USTs. General Shale Products Corporation, located approximately one-half mile <br />east of the site, registered two (2) USTs at their facility. These USTs, however, were <br />removed in 1991. <br /> <br />IDEM Leaking UST files identified no reported releases from USTs within one-half mile <br />of the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.