FEB. 22, 1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'-- ~ '- O/3Ô !qo The next item to come before the Board was the rezoning petition of Jim Remster. The Board's Attorney advised that notices had not gone out and that this matter would be continued. The next item concerned the plan unit development of Roger and Karen Raymond. Attorney Briane House was present on behalf of the petitioners. The plan unit development was presented with the respective uses set out, along with drainage and access. Attorney House stated that the traffic in the area would be very low due to the type of development proposed. Ross Holloway, registered land surveyor, explained how Goose Creek would be dealt with concerning the drainage problems. Mr. Holloway stated that there were certain limitations on the drainage in the area due to a lack of control both upstream and downstream. In particular, the upstream flow was regulated by the corrogated pipes which flowed into the land and downstream by the lack of maintenance in some adjoining properties. He did state that by cleaning out the channel, it would allow better flow. Briane House then stated that the development of the land through a planned unit development would allow for use of the seven acre tract with four acres being retained in basically a grassy area. The Board then opened up comments from the floor; there being none, the Board proceeded with discussion of the planned unit development. Shirley Welker had concerns about emergency vehicles having access through the 16 foot alley. Attorney House advised that there was sufficient onsite parking that vehicles should not be in the roadway and felt that there would be access. Dave Barry questioned the written comittments which were tendered at the prior meeting. The Board's -3-