MAY 22, 1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

'-- '-' '- ~ . -4- ~ccording to Inspector Beikman, Board Attorney Timothy Currens had sent Mr. Hatmaker A red tag. In response, Mr. Hatmaker had s~money to Mr. Currens to cover the cost of the building permit. Mr. Hatmaker was informed that he would have to appl;' fot' a variance to render the property in questjon jn compliance with the zoning orctinance. Mr. Hatmaker refused. Bill Abbott inquired as to what legal act ion the Board could take ,~t this time. At torney Ksenak inquired as to the nature of the present violation. Inspector Beikman inform~d him that Mr. Hatmaker had constructed a mini-barn on the property and was in the process of building two more. Upon motion duly made hy Bill ~bbott, seconded by Dave Barry and unanimously carried, the Board Attorney was directed to first determine whether or not the present activity on the Hatmaker property w~s a violation of the court t s previous cease and desist order! and if so, to immediately take whatever legal action is necessary to remedy the situation. Moving on to new business, Attorney Ksenak indicated that the Planni.ng Commission needed to make a recommendation to the Board of Trustees with re~ards to Inspe~tor Beikman' s salary as Build ing Inspe~to1'. Inspector Beikman indicated that his present salary WaS $210.00 per month plus 50% of all permit fees collected. Bill Abbott indi~ated that he felt Inspector Beikman was doing a conscientious joh and was entitled to a merit increase. After discussion by the Board, Wenctell Thaler moved cO increase Inspector Beikman's salary to $230.00 per month plus 50% of ~ll permit fees collected. The motion was secondeò by Dave Barry and unanimously carried. The Board briefly dis~ussed the prohlems with the unsafe vehicle oròinance; specifically, the fact that there was presently no enforcement arm of the ordinance and no place to empound the cars. The Board felt that they needed to discURS the need for an empoudmf".nt lot and wilJ dif'cUSS this matter at the next several meetings. There being no further business to come before the Board the meeting was adjou~ned upon motion ~)ly made, seconded and unanimously rarried.